Re: [rtcweb] A plea for simplicity, marketability - and... who are we designing RTCWEB for?

Wolfgang Beck <wolfgang.beck01@googlemail.com> Mon, 24 October 2011 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <wolfgang.beck01@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87EC71F0C42 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.818
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.818 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.141, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xwnJfbkmpLTl for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1671F0C41 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ggnv1 with SMTP id v1so7073711ggn.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zNAhkOtDDkpM/7LCkY3ZTc6bs1H+wJV9XQFwoRG95xo=; b=ceaH5KN9uuI1J1tU7smnbisLEV1obojlSroHKucuNcrfz//jw6TWWtH+VMqKNtfhFx OrRBsp8hSYqVh5sQScSB+x/LjLXK6IIk9BJXinffyvpFwgdRgYnG4wVm3rHkT85Cbpdr eYBGM7ex/qMlBiRhHE/4nEzAFPVlrr4HGpG2I=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.32.234 with SMTP id m10mr28999293pbi.43.1319470728985; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.49.169 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfmk5d9QWvhso7hnpbkdLh-aDzcggGi=J78X-j695YEFeg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9C8CA816-65FB-41A0-999C-4C43128CAAB4@danyork.org> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51159B91@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <CAAJUQMjHOJxCUGTwON9PmK-QEN0jM++RTWuRpmsHS-eszcNkXQ@mail.gmail.com> <4EA1B9E5.8030507@jesup.org> <CAAJUQMiWTZK8XQXcm-FS+BdbjJcTtgYeYcO6k2O7LZUY8R_3Kw@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfnQ2xn16gvKtuuJv6Ls0nTj8iHugWd7CS2ocBsn-vgf_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAAJUQMg96qw5DhNMSdCEUCtM7RoDHxvAWXAoBgGA6CM4D9M00A@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmk5d9QWvhso7hnpbkdLh-aDzcggGi=J78X-j695YEFeg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:38:48 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAJUQMgj+ZCuq2G5OWLUCM5oof90jzACZwGy=2SC0wSsXNZEyw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wolfgang Beck <wolfgang.beck01@googlemail.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?I=F1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] A plea for simplicity, marketability - and... who are we designing RTCWEB for?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:38:50 -0000

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>; wrote:
> 2011/10/24 Wolfgang Beck <wolfgang.beck01@googlemail.com>;:
>> If a caller decides to suppress her caller ID, you'll
>> just see that someone unknown called.
>
> Why are you assuming that a RTCweb call has always a caller ID?
>
I do not assume this. I was referring to Randell's question about
phone books and call lists which are only useful
if you have some kind of caller id. But of course there are many
scenarios where you don't have one.


Wolfgang