IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan-00 expired

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Thu, 30 January 2014 00:39 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDDF1A045A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:39:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.036
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HNxeHjGSOyyO for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:39:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6EF1A0453 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:39:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1742; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1391042391; x=1392251991; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=hWzzPNnXVBu5CggtyNXIueTbQZ4fiGwKTge0PUIh6nc=; b=Ywom0D3zYHYmyw35p0XaYdSKv41cnuIrOI46ysydzGV/eBC3/lLs17ZI EaswNowTp5rcTaMGGWFxNe+45JeE4J6IguwPEYjLs3QNSoa97k+kxU1Th D2GkltlVyQPgosSkTHLboQy/zLiSTn5hONwF4E3usFgUqjpYw3JJItOKu I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsFALqe6VKtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABZgwyBDr0QgQIWdIIlAQEBAwF+CwIBCBguMiUCBBOHfQjLLxeOTDqDJIEUBJRAg2iSH4Mtgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,745,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="300691918"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2014 00:39:50 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0U0dosw019987 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:39:50 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.76]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:39:50 -0600
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan-00 expired
Thread-Index: AQHPHVPIDvWqa3hd0Eu2GXTSICQjdg==
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:39:49 +0000
Message-ID: <53E06F27-3771-4B70-9820-2D789F5A2620@cisco.com>
References: <CALiegfkJe1QfMcPoDg4+71oujHUzJy86_pnLXDO9C=g_v8_4Lg@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D107730@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfkhs5JeVj-2YL2QJgwMgB1cP77aUZEWdoywQCpQd_O6Ag@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D10819E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfmyOayaz41FM+3xF733srs8MUKGMumW7nAfT53EnfEaWw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOE=z8wxWkiwf_AJJEYn5MLjepUZs__k4Qd2HdR+-h7Pw@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfkhDNqcqNXdD64zrEtDZgd2t6AM2juvjOYOBQjukz4Brw@mail.gmail.com> <52DD4634.6090904@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <52DD4634.6090904@alvestrand.no>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.164]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <DAAD0C9F3BF2BC4CAD2A9C68FA413DE0@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan-00 expired
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:39:56 -0000

We spent hundreds of hour discussing SDP between this WG and others. Much consensus was reached. The unified plan draft was a tool to help document that. Now theses decisions are being moved to the appropriate WG documents as Harald pointed out below. 

Iñaki's proposal to "'drop the absurd rule of SDP the answer MUST have the same number of m lines as the offer in order to match them" has so little support from anywhere that the WG is not spending time discussing that proposal. It has been discussed in the past and rejected. I would explain why it was rejected but I’m fairly sure Iñaki understand why and I view this as just moving into trolling at this point. We have got better things to sort out. 


On Jan 20, 2014, at 8:52 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:

> I believe that the components of -unified-plan are mainly addressed as:
> 
> - POF/PAN are going to MMUSIC
> - BUNDLE is going to MMUSIC
> - The one-track-per-M-line is going to be in -rtcweb-jsep (section 5.2.1 of -05, in particular)
> 
> But a) this is just what I think; the chairs have the task of making decisions, and b) I don't have a complete picture of whether there are pieces of -unified-plan not covered by the above.
> 
> On 01/20/2014 03:53 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>> 2014/1/20 Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>:
>>>> What we need, at least, is to drop the absurd rule of SDP "the answer
>>>> MUST have the same number of m lines as the offer in order to match
>>>> them".
>>> I don't see that happening.
>> In Unified Plan each m line has a diferent (and unique) SSRC
>> identifier. That is all we need to match m lines of the offer and the
>> answer.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email