IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan-00 expired

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Thu, 23 January 2014 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB991A00CA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 06:15:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wu6lXlkhyOG6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 06:15:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-f180.google.com (mail-qc0-f180.google.com [209.85.216.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D171A00BE for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 06:15:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id i17so2538329qcy.11 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 06:15:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=G2JNPfOl+EnWKTHuuiU1R4ubRxTTZy7tXz6OMuCSP5A=; b=IdgDCNlPh+Hq3tnOb/KJSwn/zLtXOr4nHaQKsJoPLBFgtfFmMNzKQiXdwPIxplFWX9 e4R7+DxTYTBxfNDSWn582eW1QwBpUDOJTdXy5kfeOA83u0W9mAwes8Zfnx3v8mzb9c4D Oc2JjZyRSHovLavLIIRzTfEabGKAo6xVj2sMdze5lebwJna65qNbNIrOzFZFyunZMObl qrdCnnkTKijqItnkIrMKVeCCZCPX0MtHycxs0jObX/9e+bbrhJX1kYyAnlw83CV052Bo q7ieB6sXtYIJTy7iZk/YjWIQSrHR40VvpZAbjC7POs/FYxPEr+fSUJFKDskIRKI6krbx YDRw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnzzwcZ1eUtAKvadJ2hKPIZUod7C3vixuCE52wiAU5n5lUmqRpoD2XKvFQq0CqQ9R/VOmQ/
X-Received: by 10.229.213.194 with SMTP id gx2mr11853019qcb.16.1390486521186; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 06:15:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.96.101.232 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 06:15:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52E0E3B0.5050901@ericsson.com>
References: <CALiegfkJe1QfMcPoDg4+71oujHUzJy86_pnLXDO9C=g_v8_4Lg@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D107730@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfkhs5JeVj-2YL2QJgwMgB1cP77aUZEWdoywQCpQd_O6Ag@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D10819E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfmyOayaz41FM+3xF733srs8MUKGMumW7nAfT53EnfEaWw@mail.gmail.com> <52DD7889.8030209@alum.mit.edu> <CALiegfn1CwsOmN7TdFvBG-5590q9dmyhyRJK3H6u15Ux6H=LNQ@mail.gmail.com> <52E01969.8080206@alum.mit.edu> <CALiegf=2dc8JQOJAvj0BYTfsUr4jSo-iHrUgMv0vc2agm9wx8g@mail.gmail.com> <52E0E3B0.5050901@ericsson.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:15:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfk0eSx6Wuj3u-vxrnXaj0f3BUGpFMopKHL47Ma1hOEzPA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan-00 expired
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:15:23 -0000

2014/1/23 Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>:
> Iñaki,
> (As WG Chair)
>
> I don't see these posting as productive for the WG. We have a consensus
> on using SDP and Offer/Answer. This WG can't change the Offer/Answer
> process. That is done in MMUSIC.
>
> So please stop wasting peoples time with proposals that doesn't fit the
> limits established by consensus decisions.

Hi Magnus.

Currently I was not proposing to drop SDP but to modify the current
SDP spec for WebRTC (taking into account that AFAIK it is not yet
fulfilled). The feature I was asking for is not feasible with SDP so I
was certainly wrong, but it was not my intention to reopen the debate
about SDP yes or not.

Best regards.



-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email