Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various drafts

"Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com> Thu, 01 August 2013 12:05 UTC

Return-Path: <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C71C21E8123 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 05:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.930, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1GHMDHKjyrY9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 05:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com (senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com [62.134.46.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462AE11E8137 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 05:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MCHP01HTC.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.42.234]) by senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com (Server) with ESMTP id D1F651EB873A; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 14:05:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net ([169.254.1.30]) by MCHP01HTC.global-ad.net ([172.29.42.234]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 14:05:02 +0200
From: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various drafts
Thread-Index: AQHOeRlA+vvnmXNqhUeR61l9KjX9j5lfTEdggCEe9DA=
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:05:01 +0000
Message-ID: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF14B43E0E@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
References: <7A95191A-6488-435E-B491-FEF3A6AC342F@iii.ca> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1163E4A1@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
In-Reply-To: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1163E4A1@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.29.42.225]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various drafts
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 12:05:55 -0000

Looking at the chairs status slides at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/slides/slides-87-rtcweb-6.pdf.

It appears that draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations is still missing from the list.

Can you please add it to the list?

Regards
Andy



> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Hutton, Andrew
> Sent: 11 July 2013 12:19
> To: Cullen Jennings; rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various drafts
> 
> There are things missing from the list.
> 
> For example the charter and the requirements indicate that we need to
> address the firewall issue so we need a draft for that.
> 
> I hope we will adopt draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations to
> cover this and of course assuming we do then I think it is nearly done
> but others might think differently.
> 
> I have not been through the requirements document to see if there are
> other things missing.
> 
> Regards
> Andy
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of Cullen Jennings
> > Sent: 05 July 2013 01:47
> > To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> > Subject: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various drafts
> >
> >
> > As part of putting together some chair slides for Berlin, I'm trying
> to
> > get a very rough idea of where things are. I'd like to get folks
> input
> > on what percent done various drafts are where Done is a published
> RFC.
> >
> > This is nearly impossible to do at any level of accuracy but I do
> want
> > to get a vague idea. I took a very rough stab below just to have a
> > starting point to get the conversation going. I'm sure my numbers are
> > mostly wrong but I have tried to ask a few people and sort of take
> the
> > central cluster of the guess. If you think I am way out, please
> provide
> > some feedback of what you think the number actually is.
> >
> > I'm happy to get feedback on specific drafts or feedback of the form
> > they are all too low or too high. I do encourage people to
> > realistically look at the data tracker to see how long other drafts
> > have taken for each stage to get a baseline instead of just going
> with
> > their gut feel.
> >
> > Thanks, Cullen
> >
> > PS - if you are an author and look at the number next to your draft
> and
> > think it is way off, please please, say something.
> >
> >
> >
> > draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview		80
> > draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements	70
> > http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/getusermedia.html	70
> > draft-burnett-rtcweb-constraints-registry		80
> > http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html	50
> > draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri		80
> > draft-petithuguenin-behave-turn-uris		80
> > draft-ietf-rtcweb-security		80
> > draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch		80
> > draft-muthu-behave-consent-freshness-02 	50
> > draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel		70
> > draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp		70
> > draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-protocol 		50
> > draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps		70
> > draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage		40
> > draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis		80
> > draft-ietf-avtcore-avp-codecs		80
> > draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-encrypted-header-ext	80
> > draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates		70
> > draft-lennox-rtcweb-rtp-media-type-mux 		80
> > draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers		70
> > draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-media-rtp-session 	70
> > draft-lennox-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream		70
> > draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep		50
> > draft-ietf-mmusic-msid		70
> > draft-rescorla-mmusic-ice-trickle		25
> > draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation	50
> > draft-nandakumar-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes	25
> > draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos		10 or 90
> > draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio		50
> > draft-ietf-payload-rtp-opus		90
> > draft-ietf-payload-vp8-08		95
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb