Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various drafts
Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Fri, 12 July 2013 01:09 UTC
Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE8B11E827F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.784
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.784 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.815, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yk4+2KvzqC5o for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689F811E8279 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc-vpn6-1543.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B581622E256; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:09:27 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <51DE6CC9.2050505@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:09:26 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BD864815-4C1F-47C1-B393-A771CFE87419@iii.ca>
References: <7A95191A-6488-435E-B491-FEF3A6AC342F@iii.ca> <51DE6CC9.2050505@ericsson.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various drafts
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:09:43 -0000
On Jul 11, 2013, at 1:28 AM, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote: > On 2013-07-05 02:47, Cullen Jennings wrote: >> draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage 40 > > I disagree that that this is as low as 40%. There are some few thorny > issues that might take some discussion to resolve. However, most things > are from an authors perspective quite solid. I would say 60-70%. Not sure how I got 40 on that one. 60-70 makes sense. (and rest of email but just wanted to reply to this part right away
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Cullen Jennings
- [rtcweb] Question about the status of various dra… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Harald Alvestrand