Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 29 October 2013 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFD011E8255; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.525
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.525 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LPoORWt8FsYd; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED55421E809B; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id f4so419271wiw.16 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=y44Xqc3N4wTXUPAst2cL9Yc2wpl6ja61XUk9b3UTHA4=; b=oyW6r5IK7O0yBhep2fI1WGdY4FVN7tN15ApySaCV6tDcEcw752PD6ESUVhpZv2s7lK ABWPsc47OraBpFt0bEInmNld/ejWiJl78j0Gd2hIwEc7SGzTcEYTPXTpgnH+Il8OioO4 1TnX39iZ4V3PUvdsNiUjUyDH5FX5zHzoXARrd8de87LybohQSw9+dn3XAiASznEgXLfL ln57Eo8m2iUGStaN2PfhIssbf65C4YA/ApEngfYH1KFc7B9+ZbTjIjFx9uDoiMdWcU9s KHtOOWdsmp16g6BM1UvIwRBtuOeSGQF05fZwgGabpj4evQkhbrXijk5VWyD6YEveiNpE HZTQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.208.49 with SMTP id mb17mr14376539wic.64.1383076892184; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.202.194 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <52700D33.30102@nostrum.com>
References: <CAA93jw72QwmwQ1+wqG9soa8joiuLGRiaKuYnTvkHqkQ20FQ+gg@mail.gmail.com> <52700D33.30102@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:01:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXuDwCfVGzAfBZe=73DJca8vfC9J8+uJ_tz4MyUWdTXTw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "rmcat@ietf.org" <rmcat@ietf.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:01:33 -0000

On 29 October 2013 12:32, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> In theory, what you're looking for is this:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4175

I'm surprised that this didn't come up in the codec discussions.  Of
course, you'd want to use FEC so that you could reduce the need for
loss concealment.