Re: [rtcweb] [rmcat] compressed codec-free webrtc?

[Justin Uberti <[e-mail]>]

Uncompressed 720p30 (I420) is ~330 Mbps, so even though bandwidth continues
to increase, we're still not at the point where we no longer need codecs
(in the general case).


On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Dave Taht <[e-mail]> wrote:

> In having my eyes glaze over at the codec debate I found myself
> wondering to what extent anyone was pursuing truly low latency video
> and audio, along the lines of what the lola project has been doing for
> collaborative concerts.
>
> See:
>
> http://www.conts.it/artistica/lola-project
>
> They ship raw audio and raw video, they actually use cameras where
> they can get at scanlines and ship that (saving 16ms)
>
> So I'm ignorant of what webrtc can do is there a codec selection (yuv?
> 48 bit audio? for the rawest video and audio possible?) All the extra
> encoding steps we take today induce extra latency, and available
> bandwidth continues to increase... and from a cc perspective if you
> drop some bits from a scanline that's not a problem, but from audio
> it's a huge deal....
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
>