IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?

Leon Geyser <lgeyser@gmail.com> Tue, 29 October 2013 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <lgeyser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB84411E81C9; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ydJLtxM8hYlU; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com (mail-lb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994D611E8297; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u14so539665lbd.1 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=skLYJiAZtq9ZtmYQ8tuWhjA6ZKsb9ZS+BN8fWxcpwXQ=; b=EV8OU8h/nwythqTisfxP9IgwGyAun8kblIEwO0g2eLCdj0ThQzRojmh6ImsQbaOCm3 Ueuo6J1SIndUqULN4ptMzDrLQyh12LI35a5Lj4jm+dkjv9WE69u562of8iJa1aK/cOx6 RA89dWouYIrcpHCl17rEz7t00OWdRzB9C8u8oKBV+D5S3pBGeWpAuBKtEMKf3OEW06kD F57qgEqoK0zX3uGPSLFbd+pj9iMFvPraTmoSAMJOIOMGQ2N89plab7ZizaiVaeVrvtjc +GI6dQpBVqEHxoFXR0TVDyqUAQFxXDiSCcrGtoOSqBE6o2mTp4jx8OdXYMgho4ZY4UsB /Chw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.143.166 with SMTP id sf6mr1206966lbb.29.1383081277460; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.168.70 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXuDwCfVGzAfBZe=73DJca8vfC9J8+uJ_tz4MyUWdTXTw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw72QwmwQ1+wqG9soa8joiuLGRiaKuYnTvkHqkQ20FQ+gg@mail.gmail.com> <52700D33.30102@nostrum.com> <CABkgnnXuDwCfVGzAfBZe=73DJca8vfC9J8+uJ_tz4MyUWdTXTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:14:37 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGgHUiQwNS434JSinStW+xJ4pwrdX5CR-idx3k8VYA=_O7zhWA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Leon Geyser <lgeyser@gmail.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e012296f43d13da04e9e7b42f"
Cc: "rmcat@ietf.org" <rmcat@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:14:41 -0000

Meanwhile where I live how long would it take to show one frame over a
256Kbit/s connection? :)
The MTI codec needs to be a lossy codec.


On 29 October 2013 22:01, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 29 October 2013 12:32, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> > In theory, what you're looking for is this:
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4175
>
> I'm surprised that this didn't come up in the codec discussions.  Of
> course, you'd want to use FEC so that you could reduce the need for
> loss concealment.
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email