IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] NAT behavior heuristics

Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com> Sun, 05 August 2012 22:22 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6B221F851B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 15:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.468
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.131, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Si7cb-pCtfjD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 15:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987B621F8578 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 15:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lahm15 with SMTP id m15so1287172lah.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 15:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8hvSEPkgYuGfokL3bmn4vrYit8ZeNRIyRdR2hIfYvbc=; b=LatE2oiDdahD6Sw2lYH5MHAFKu9nSQfAbZIsPoH/AoMIWiunhtcIR3pLmTfEh9DSIp L/Z6et6fP/Ce/OMzqo+MtnRRQEockmCFJGZ28FPdfQVElGBNECmBoZd1KyOS7okFjHST nejK2b89WTX0OfAJperkz1nA348YHVB2kkHXHfsqVoFny+DKNZHSz21CxXvkJAZC/EAP Hmv3+sM91Zuot1iYd9vfwuq+5debp7pa3890zru/uXqdLbonBISmNtK3oXuB0Cwnbfa5 lZJUczJXKtk/JldRZzaZPhBMZMDJgH7NIY8yQ9jGS7r8BNwGYxDOctBsOfRPQjWIIdaO t9Bg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.146.101 with SMTP id tb5mr8711930lab.0.1344205322592; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 15:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.3.196 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 15:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A1477C17F@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
References: <038b01cd70d6$8c5bc870$a5135950$@com> <CABkgnnW+pCnDZuYHDj6=7xdqRwM6AO48RrC1xhMrvFZbUBgtyw@mail.gmail.com> <04ff01cd7104$be09bed0$3a1d3c70$@com> <501E1E40.8070203@jesup.org> <CAD6AjGTrd0d9dm5HC2xr=ZAU2DmU55Sdkm6rH8NO4sJMMuLScA@mail.gmail.com> <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A1477C17F@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 15:22:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGTEH+12WfKavx7H_xpfeynEL6W33L9nD98_vztVodGTuA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "phdgang@gmail.com" <phdgang@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] NAT behavior heuristics
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 22:22:08 -0000

On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
<tireddy@cisco.com> wrote:
>> Fyi. I have not seen any traction for pcp anywhere in the mobile space.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chen-pcp-mobile-deployment-01 describes usage of PCP in Mobile Deployments.
>
> --Tiru.
>

Yep, that's  an I-D.

And, it says things like "Without
   the particular considerations , PCP may not provide desirable
   outcomes.  Some default behaviours may even cause negative impacts or
   system failures in a mobile environment.  "

Got an operators with a timeline on supporting it?  How about a mobile
OS that plans to support PCP, because you will need both.  And, that
would be interesting information.

I asked around in Vancouver about PCP, and all the operators i spoke
to said no-plans, no motivation.  But, that was a small sample.

In any event, my only point is that RTCWEB should NOT be counting on
PCP.  If PCP is a tool you have, use it.  My point: it is not a tool
you have.

CB

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email