Re: WGLC for BFD over Link Aggregate Group Interfaces - ends November 8

"Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 24 October 2013 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B582611E8351 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rI7YI8vM8NsY for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D25611E8156 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-122.lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r9OJT8Zr017528 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:29:10 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id r9OJT7T9007495 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 24 Oct 2013 21:29:08 +0200
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.193]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 21:29:07 +0200
From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WGLC for BFD over Link Aggregate Group Interfaces - ends November 8
Thread-Topic: WGLC for BFD over Link Aggregate Group Interfaces - ends November 8
Thread-Index: AQHO0O1M80Tu8oAhPE+i2xw2+/vu3JoEPLqA
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 19:29:07 +0000
Message-ID: <CE8F4198.8CC44%wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131024191431.GO17538@pfrc>
Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2B8B8C1A8B84704F8ED3A3EB7E739B46@exchange.lucent.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 19:29:19 -0000

support

On 24/10/13 21:14, "Jeffrey Haas" <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

>This email is to initiate working group last call on the BFD on Link
>Aggregate Group Interfaces document:
>
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-on-lags-01
>
>The last call will complete on November 8, the end of IETF week.  Time
>will
>be available during the Vancouver IETF BFD session to discuss last call
>comments.
>
>Nobo Akiya will be serving as document shepherd (RFC 4858) for this WGLC.
>
>Due to the small nature of the BFD working group and the fact that both
>working group chairs have contributed to this document, we have gotten
>Carlos Pignataro (cpignata@cisco.com) to volunteer to serve as an
>independent party to gauge working group consensus.
>
>In order to facilitate the transparency of this WGLC, please remember to
>send all comments to the working group mailing list.
>
>IPR declarations have been filed against this draft and the document
>authors
>and contributors have been polled for any further IPR.  Current IPR
>declarations may be seen at the following link:
>
>http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id=draft-ie
>tf-bfd-on-lags
>
>If you are aware of additional IPR against this document please declare
>so, per
>the IETF Note Well.
>
>Finally, the IEEE has expressed interest in the disposition of this draft.
>They will likely provide additional commentary, if any, via the IETF
>liaison
>process.  This process will likely happen after WGLC concludes.  Depending
>on their feedback, WGLC may re-open to address their concerns.
>
>-- Jeff (for the chairs)