Re: WGLC for BFD over Link Aggregate Group Interfaces - ends November 8

Shishio Tsuchiya <shtsuchi@cisco.com> Fri, 25 October 2013 01:46 UTC

Return-Path: <shtsuchi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2271F11E828D for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9DV69KbmAuC9 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bgl-iport-2.cisco.com (bgl-iport-2.cisco.com [72.163.197.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D079C11E8288 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1669; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1382665574; x=1383875174; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rOtFakWIvygXyzrkLHIMHKu8g+hNwX8IMjskOnZl+cw=; b=dylP1NiVbWsZS1AlrK2RJ+3vZqrBwLTaKAsn8zpyqNX7vVzkk75kl6WG ihG8WlNmCD3gMwvdkfEIOi06XQBw8moDa8cxHt6F9pqJjvIGcfBCNEzLg /W4JPRfgHi2OaPeRfj4jejW8Z1T0swq0w/W6WY1QBT0eN8YQ0sSMUAkZM Y=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,567,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="36194409"
Received: from vla196-nat.cisco.com (HELO bgl-core-3.cisco.com) ([72.163.197.24]) by bgl-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Oct 2013 01:45:55 +0000
Received: from tky-shtsuchi-8916.cisco.com (tky-shtsuchi-8916.cisco.com [10.71.44.87]) by bgl-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9P1jgK7031118; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 01:45:45 GMT
Message-ID: <5269CD46.3050909@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:45:42 +0900
From: Shishio Tsuchiya <shtsuchi@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WGLC for BFD over Link Aggregate Group Interfaces - ends November 8
References: <20131024191431.GO17538@pfrc>
In-Reply-To: <20131024191431.GO17538@pfrc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 01:46:23 -0000

support

Regards,
-Shishio

(2013/10/25 4:14), Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> This email is to initiate working group last call on the BFD on Link
> Aggregate Group Interfaces document:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-on-lags-01
> 
> The last call will complete on November 8, the end of IETF week.  Time will
> be available during the Vancouver IETF BFD session to discuss last call
> comments.
> 
> Nobo Akiya will be serving as document shepherd (RFC 4858) for this WGLC.
> 
> Due to the small nature of the BFD working group and the fact that both
> working group chairs have contributed to this document, we have gotten
> Carlos Pignataro (cpignata@cisco.com) to volunteer to serve as an
> independent party to gauge working group consensus.
> 
> In order to facilitate the transparency of this WGLC, please remember to
> send all comments to the working group mailing list.
> 
> IPR declarations have been filed against this draft and the document authors
> and contributors have been polled for any further IPR.  Current IPR
> declarations may be seen at the following link:
> 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id=draft-ietf-bfd-on-lags
> 
> If you are aware of additional IPR against this document please declare so, per
> the IETF Note Well.
> 
> Finally, the IEEE has expressed interest in the disposition of this draft.
> They will likely provide additional commentary, if any, via the IETF liaison
> process.  This process will likely happen after WGLC concludes.  Depending
> on their feedback, WGLC may re-open to address their concerns.
> 
> -- Jeff (for the chairs)
> .
>