IETF Logo Mail Archive

WGLC for BFD over Link Aggregate Group Interfaces - ends November 8

Ashesh Mishra <mishra.ashesh@outlook.com> Fri, 01 November 2013 18:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mishra.ashesh@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6C211E81C6 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 11:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GwgE7rphjPAR for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 11:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bay0-omc4-s4.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc4-s4.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.190.206]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7951A11E819D for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 11:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BAY176-W32 ([65.54.190.201]) by bay0-omc4-s4.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 1 Nov 2013 11:58:54 -0700
X-TMN: [1Bx6tTfspZl8vrq8nMEpmquift6uH0ZC]
X-Originating-Email: [mishra.ashesh@outlook.com]
Message-ID: <BAY176-W326F85F0A92071D8333280FAF50@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_143a8097-0981-4a66-9de4-4f3bb406b374_"
From: Ashesh Mishra <mishra.ashesh@outlook.com>
To: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Subject: WGLC for BFD over Link Aggregate Group Interfaces - ends November 8
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 11:58:54 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20131101012840441464.ae114f50@sniff.de>
References: <20131024191431.GO17538@pfrc>, <315041E4211CB84E86EF7C25A2AB583D337EBFB3@xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com>, <425296D4-F96F-49FF-86D2-40737B64E117@gmail.com>, <20211F91F544D247976D84C5D778A4C32E4EEE0D@SG70YWXCHMBA05.zap.alcatel-lucent.com>, <931B5B03-5578-428D-BA5B-F3311E31305B@gmail.com>, <20131101012840441464.ae114f50@sniff.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Nov 2013 18:58:54.0487 (UTC) FILETIME=[69473A70:01CED734]
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:59:00 -0000

Hi all,

Does the mechanism proposed in this draft suggest that the transmitting end will multicast the BFD CC frames over the LAG and the receiving end will have a Rx session for every member of the LAG?

If so, how will the session negotiation work with more than one endpoint on the peer node?

--
Ashesh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email