IETF Logo Mail Archive

When the IETF can discuss drafts seriously?

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> Tue, 19 December 2017 20:46 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D0D12D854; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:46:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.127
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.127 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3s8Sw5Er-kyP; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:46:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR03-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092072039.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.72.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E3121201F2; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:46:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=xVBejU6VmTQk3rH5S0a2Np+iGb2eZEX2D/EsH+0IvzQ=; b=U/Fy6nicoJ1i20+dijlH13yl/7a7KibkgNSdnM/hlpKhcq9WuHOJXHgbQ8d+mfOHLnuS82R8N9ozm7NIkISjmmAdLPINGbldOCxH1A5mmIy89NTJzh8TpcrnA0fgZ9MY8niRiWpxEWitboonkFSawOtHi9NiRxRda0qbR+xPRSst3MfMif0IEG1no9BnRqgxS+FX+5BcHjwYVrMZab1zPTH7xmicB+ospZ6yI73IcVmhM+rVDK6VEeHWFEa9w5o/l/8CDEKa9bNvJtmd3vv1lKWmn/B7bhHpd/V+eZ6j89EaEkFu0jxHyTs7loBpr46VquTNsNcjx9Pufj8gkO7wMg==
Received: from AM5EUR03FT057.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.16.51) by AM5EUR03HT097.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.17.174) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.20.302.6; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:46:29 +0000
Received: from AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.16.55) by AM5EUR03FT057.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.17.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.20.302.6 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:46:29 +0000
Received: from AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2588:3246:d594:c004]) by AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2588:3246:d594:c004%17]) with mapi id 15.20.0323.018; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:46:29 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
To: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
CC: rtgwg <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: When the IETF can discuss drafts seriously?
Thread-Topic: When the IETF can discuss drafts seriously?
Thread-Index: AQHTeQpxL62Qror8QkyB91Q7VFl5xQ==
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:46:29 +0000
Message-ID: <AM4PR0401MB2241817BD0EEEE79B32C8CD2BD0F0@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:06E02FDFCB02CCD43AD6231136A74DBF8A23D9847CEF4FB0E0EAE949D3956F71; UpperCasedChecksum:760E78DB447E34473768BFADF801728E942F413F8A1E12FC29FC4E7C442D3B36; SizeAsReceived:6933; Count:45
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-tmn: [Xq/WXU6ldvY0/mzCU0R3CQilMABGY+Cq]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM5EUR03HT097; 6:YYJcwMsICNMygrHBH7+U/mL5DTGLdvVoAG6bBQQzIGKqJcNEtkgGiqh2eqlaEY3ugbvj3Exgrw4hSzG8Vtk/qnsAmrhXjbH8s5/22NGUAcO48Q42WX+XxLUtLgAfwd/rYuer98Dz9I3NVfQ4l9pujzKWD4UCIRpZtN5GzdHkYfnz1s+H+PoNH0qOlRg4ALIu0J6HtXogBFFlTr09a80CJQbugLD1dBe1r2hrGgwZIr00e0WKBMNzYwDy82hbaMJm8SFf40DrSE5tUdAzrj4bNl6V0F471vk/zeTR6g/enQurYymz+13fzlm2uKYc6wkHzyNkSQm+nEPxXW84sBJVOg==; 5:b/AJxJci1YQiiOWjxBk4Xj+K8wkc1CaA6Lb9/SYiBW5f59BqGnkGXW0C/pYpyjtADB9G0ckoWJ2E4zZjNZD1DFbY1jAuaDqbIvZURPPXepDeog2UHMX1/91v2Dyeh7tZVXB7Nsns7MwhZBO4+xa0TLKoDvC1c6RyaL6ohFxHoek=; 24:Szx7SCi9bplPgrWlH5AhCL6EMgBzOwQgl+524wtUkWo2rBG55SCe1pcXQrvfLDSwkIG3inHZ5no1aXUKFo/lIKtOLKyELrGzUihQSDOibkQ=; 7:HTdbe4Ky1Y61kGh/rqZqJKQejlFjmIKX5JzhiENlMGyAAktOezB3AGJwUsbu5bzk2rxvGxXj+asxa04gou9497tE9upvtsU1LOX7ZT6nI8ilNsYznAupfLydNQrsrQxkFE8v92m5G5XeKR/7QvadrGjcW3v0fw1BFyj9vtzCn3X6Eqf/AIRuf9rrihAPJm8/vK71MH+fDsA5fPxc6wGFt6Vb/dEsavOAyPojwb20xbhpjmyGHWhj04f/HcnhbML+
x-incomingheadercount: 45
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322404)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045); SRVR:AM5EUR03HT097;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM5EUR03HT097:
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cd03dc67-9ecd-45e9-7cff-08d5472193f0
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:AM5EUR03HT097; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:AM5EUR03HT097;
x-forefront-prvs: 052670E5A4
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:AM5EUR03HT097; H:AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <DB59FE8F85FAE941B28DC37A3EC51B5D@eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cd03dc67-9ecd-45e9-7cff-08d5472193f0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Dec 2017 20:46:29.2422 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5EUR03HT097
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/mxJaa_QfHmeTEovjjfhDIKe1PtY>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:46:33 -0000

Hi all,

I noticed that the IETF participants gives only negative comments regarding the submitted IDs, that is good in some cases if it is true, but to ignore the positive side and the added values on every draft is something that should be changed, I always aim to find a true technical discussion on the mailing list to add something new or to correct something wrong with confidence.

It's been long time on the rtgwg mailing list and didn't have any technical discussion or comments for KRP and NEP or even an official review.

I believe that the IETF participants can show alot from their expertise to add, modify, or delete something from an existing draft.

Of course there are all kind of people at the IETF and some of them may be interested and can make a decision.

Thanks,

Khaled

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email