IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Soliciting WG feedback and comments on draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00

Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com> Mon, 21 October 2013 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F1611E8357 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.070, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZJv+fXXtlrrY for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0688611E8312 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-b7fe28e000000d82-3a-52648c286a6a
Received: from EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.90]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 58.FB.03458.82C84625; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 04:06:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB101.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.118]) by EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.90]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 22:06:32 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
To: Yangang <yangang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Soliciting WG feedback and comments on draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00
Thread-Topic: Soliciting WG feedback and comments on draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00
Thread-Index: AQHOzf/GzJU1wXMyskyzrVWgwEKZ4Zn+q2CA
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 02:06:32 +0000
Message-ID: <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE470309F337@eusaamb101.ericsson.se>
References: <D496C972D1A13540A730720631EC73413A39ECE3@nkgeml507-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <D496C972D1A13540A730720631EC73413A39ECE3@nkgeml507-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.134]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <9B80CCA09391AE46B71087D649979D0D@ericsson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPlK5mT0qQwazzAhYX3vxmtuh5coXZ 4s23G2wOzB4tR96yeixZ8pMpgCmKyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK+Pc270sBWskKvbe+8TcwHhHvIuR k0NCwETiSdtKVghbTOLCvfVsXYxcHEICRxklemc9hnKWM0psenmKDaSKTUBH4vmjf8wgtoiA gkTD/X4WEJtZIEli8Y42dhBbGMieO7GNFaImWaLp+GOoeiOJRRsbwGpYBFQlWiceA4vzCvhK LD+xCGyOkECoxOTmp2C9nAJhEpvWfwGLMwJd9/3UGiaIXeISt57MZ4K4WkBiyZ7zzBC2qMTL x/+gvlGWWPJkP1AvB1C9psT6XfoQrdYSi/Z2sULYihJTuh+yQ5wgKHFy5hOWCYzis5BsmIXQ PQtJ9ywk3bOQdC9gZF3FyFFanFqWm25kuIkRGF3HJNgcdzAu+GR5iFGag0VJnPfLW+cgIYH0 xJLU7NTUgtSi+KLSnNTiQ4xMHJxSDYyCD6rfmj/MtbdW/1S/8srWXwpffZ65te2ZsnbqNe86 B9GSJ9vib/1rPiqp73H+uK5h0Pt/n64nKhp7c3Z97G49eebdvumJNyPWr5QO8nYMeLk+9oG5 /jwNzohHuyJDXiS9cK5dL7b2V46JG9fLCcFb/j733V65MkDm5spFH0qOnN1pNO+P2sxGJZbi jERDLeai4kQAZPpEInwCAAA=
Cc: "Zhangxudong (zhangxudong, VRP)" <zhangxudong@huawei.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 02:07:10 -0000

Can you contrast this with RFC 6976? You include RFC 6976 in the Normative References but it is never referenced (this will show up if you run idnits). 
Acee 
On Oct 20, 2013, at 9:49 PM, Yangang wrote:

> Hi:
> 
> We had submitted the a new draft: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00, we want to discuss the micro-loop problem through another method. Your feedback and comments on the rtgwg mailing list are appreciated. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Rahul.Yan
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
> 发送时间: 2013年10月18日 15:47
> 收件人: Zhangxudong (zhangxudong, VRP); Yangang
> 主题: New Version Notification for draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00.txt
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Xudong Zhang and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Filename:	 draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment
> Revision:	 00
> Title:		 Algorithm for Ordered Metric Adjustment
> Creation date:	 2013-10-18
> Group:		 Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 10
> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00.txt
> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment
> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>   Upon link down event or link up event, each device in network
>   individually schedules route calculation.  Because of different
>   hardware capabilities and internal/external environments, the time to
>   update forwarding entries on these devices are disordered which can
>   cause a transient forwarding loop.  This document introduces a method
>   to prevent forwarding loop by adjusting link metric gradually for
>   several times.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email