RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call

James, 

  > The usual procedure for comments is that they be sent to 
  > the list. Any
  > Last
  > Call comments must be sent to the list in order that there 
  > be a record
  > of them. I don't recall any email from you on
  > draft-ietf-seamoby-car-discovery-issues-01.txt
  > during the last call period, but perhaps I missed it. 

=> No you didn't miss it, but I think the last call 
period was a very strange time, that goes over the 
christmas break where a lot of people (especially on
this side of the world) take some holidays. 

If 
  > you have any
  > comments,
  > please send them out within the next day.

=> I've already sent my comments on the draft 
(in this thread), specifically on the assumptions
in chapter 4.1. 

  > Also note that we are talking here about the problem 
  > statement, not the
  > requirements.

=> I commented on both in my email.

Hesham

  > ----- Original Message -----
  > From: "Hesham Soliman (ERA)" <hesham.soliman@era.ericsson.se>
  > To: "'James Kempf'" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>; <seamoby@ietf.org>
  > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:59 AM
  > Subject: RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call
  > 
  > 
  > >   >
  > >   > WG Last call has expired on the following drafts:
  > >   >
  > >   > 1) draft-ietf-seamoby-context-transfer-problem-stat-04.txt
  > >   > 2) draft-ietf-seamoby-ct-reqs-02.txt
  > >   > 3) draft-ietf-seamoby-car-discovery-issues-01.txt
  > >   > 4) draft-ietf-seamoby-paging-protocol-assessment-00.txt
  > >   >
  > >   > No comments were received on 1) and 3), they will now 
  > be sent to
  > the
  > >   > IESG for review.
  > >
  > > => Just a minute, we _are_ discussing comments on 3).
  > > I've also made these comments in London.
  > >
  > > Hesham
  > >
  > 

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby