Re: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call
"Govind Krishnamurthi" <govs23@hotmail.com> Sat, 12 January 2002 00:20 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA03502 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:20:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA21767; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:03:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA21738 for <seamoby@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:02:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hotmail.com (f237.law9.hotmail.com [64.4.9.237]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA03323 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:02:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:02:25 -0800
Received: from 63.78.179.4 by lw9fd.law9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 00:02:25 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [63.78.179.4]
From: Govind Krishnamurthi <govs23@hotmail.com>
To: seamoby@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:02:25 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <F237RbQghl1c5XGt6xo0001ae1a@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jan 2002 00:02:25.0654 (UTC) FILETIME=[6AC0C960:01C19AFC]
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
Do we loose much by letting 4.12 stay? I don't see this such a big problem as the transferring AR much get the context prior to transfer anyways.. so the only point is how much prior. Maybe I'm missing something. -Govind. > > > > Since I spoke up before and my name was mentioned in the recent > > exchange.... > > > > I do not care about 4.12 or 4.15, one way or another. > > > > I do care about 5.5.2, but these requirements have revisited > > so many times that the rationale behind them are ethereal, > > so I will sit firmly on the fence. > > > > How that for an explicit non-vote? > > > > Gary > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: James Kempf [mailto:kempf@docomolabs-usa.com] > > > Sent: January 11, 2002 17:10 > > > To: George Tsirtsis; Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1; seamoby@ietf.org > > > Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From what I remember Gary said that he supports the > > > removal of 3 out > > > of the > > > > 4 points....so the 2 opinions against the removal do not >constitute > > > what I > > > > would call....WG consensus do they? In fact only Madjid > > > said that "we > > > could > > > > re-word but not remove"...who was the 2nd person against removal? > > > > > > > > Maybe you should ask "who cares?" > > > > > > > > > > Alright, but this is *the very last time*. We do really need > > > to get this > > > document on the way. > > > This is a concensus call. Is there any opposition to removing the > > > following requirements > > > from draft-ietf-seamoby-ct-reqs-02.txt: > > > > > > 4.12 The context information to be transferred MUST be > > > available at the > > > AR > > > performing the transfer, prior to the initiation of a given > > > phase of the > > > context transfer. > > > 4.13 The context transfer solution WILL NOT verify the context > > > information > > > prior to transfer. > > > 4.15 The context transfer solution MAY include methods for > > > interworking > > > with > > > non-IETF mobility solutions. > > > 5.5.2 A context update MUST preserve the integrity, and thus the > > > meaning, of > > > the context at each receiving AR. > > > > > > Speak until Monday 3 PM Pacific Standard time or forever hold your > > > peace. > > > > > > jak > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Seamoby mailing list > > > Seamoby@ietf.org > > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Seamoby mailing list >Seamoby@ietf.org >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
- [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call James Kempf
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Hesham Soliman (ERA)
- Re: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call James Kempf
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1
- Re: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Hemant Chaskar
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call George Tsirtsis
- Re: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call James Kempf
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Gary Kenward
- Re: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Govind Krishnamurthi
- Re: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Satish Jamadagni
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Hesham Soliman (ERA)
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Hesham Soliman (ERA)
- Re: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call James Kempf
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Hemant Chaskar
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1
- Re: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call James Kempf
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Hesham Soliman (ERA)
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Pat R. Calhoun
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Pat R. Calhoun
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Hesham Soliman (ERA)
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Pat R. Calhoun
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Scott Bradner
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Hesham Soliman (ERA)
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Trossen Dirk (NRC/Boston)
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Hesham Soliman (ERA)
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Trossen Dirk (NRC/Boston)
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Hemant Chaskar
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Govind Krishnamurthi
- RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call Hesham Soliman (ERA)