IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call

"James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> Fri, 11 January 2002 18:00 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA23718 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:00:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA09156; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:45:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA09126 for <seamoby@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:45:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from docomolabs-usa.com (fridge.docomo-usa.com [216.98.102.228]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA23095 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:45:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from T23KEMPF (dhcp126.docomo-usa.com [172.21.96.126]) by docomolabs-usa.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id g0BHinS08807 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:44:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <00eb01c19ac7$7185d450$7e6015ac@T23KEMPF>
From: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: seamoby@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:43:13 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

WG Last call has expired on the following drafts:

1) draft-ietf-seamoby-context-transfer-problem-stat-04.txt
2) draft-ietf-seamoby-ct-reqs-02.txt
3) draft-ietf-seamoby-car-discovery-issues-01.txt
4) draft-ietf-seamoby-paging-protocol-assessment-00.txt

No comments were received on 1) and 3), they will now be sent to the
IESG for review.

On 3), one comment was received to remove 4 requirements, but there were
two opinions expressed
that the document should remain unchanged, so this document will be sent
to the IESG as is for
review.

On 4), a desire was expressed for some additional text describing the
decision process. This text
is currently undergoing review by the WG chairs and ADs for inclusion in
the document. An updated
document will be issued when the text is incorporated and another WG
last call will be scheduled.

                    jak




_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email