IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call

"James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> Fri, 11 January 2002 21:14 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA29852 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:14:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA15930; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:03:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA15899 for <seamoby@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:03:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from docomolabs-usa.com (fridge.docomo-usa.com [216.98.102.228]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA29508 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:03:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from T23KEMPF (dhcp126.docomo-usa.com [172.21.96.126]) by docomolabs-usa.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id g0BL31S17087; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:03:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <01d001c19ae3$215c5f00$7e6015ac@T23KEMPF>
From: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1 <Madjid.Nakhjiri@motorola.com>, seamoby@ietf.org
References: <35DBB8B7AC89D4118E98009027B1009B0464FD47@IL27EXM10.cig.mot.com>
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:01:25 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>
> WG Last call has expired on the following drafts:
>
> 1) draft-ietf-seamoby-context-transfer-problem-stat-04.txt
> 2) draft-ietf-seamoby-ct-reqs-02.txt
> 3) draft-ietf-seamoby-car-discovery-issues-01.txt
> 4) draft-ietf-seamoby-paging-protocol-assessment-00.txt
>
> No comments were received on 1) and 3), they will now be sent to the
> IESG for review.
>
>
>
> Madjid>> You mean 1) and 2), right?
>

No, I mean 1 and 3. George, you and Gary all had comments on 2. That's
what
the next paragraph was about:

>
>
>
>
> On 3), one comment was received to remove 4 requirements, but there
were
> two opinions expressed
> that the document should remain unchanged, so this document will be
sent
> to the IESG as is for
> review.
>

OK, I see the confusion. This should say "On 2)..." Sorry.

            jak


_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email