Re: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call

Hi Hesham,

I also did not see any comment from you on the NSIS list during the first 
last call that has not been attended to. What was the text of your email, is 
it there in list archives? If so, please point me to that and I will take 
care of your concern.

Also, note that this is the "second" WG last call for the same draft. When 
we make multiple last calls, we should try to build upon the text of the 
previous call. Hence, in the second WG calls we should restrict the comments 
to either the new text that is added after the first call or the relation 
between the new text and the previous text. Directly making major changes in 
the old text during second call without its any reletion to the new text 
will just keep us infinitely in the last calls phase. Nonetheless, we can 
"finetune" the old text for better clarity.

Also, please note the difference between the "issues" draft, the 
"requirements" draft and the "solutions" draft.

Hemant

>From: "James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
>To: "Hesham Soliman \(ERA\)" <hesham.soliman@era.ericsson.se>,        
><seamoby@ietf.org>
>Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call
>Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:19:05 -0800
>
>Hesham,
>
>The usual procedure for comments is that they be sent to the list. Any
>Last
>Call comments must be sent to the list in order that there be a record
>of them. I don't recall any email from you on
>draft-ietf-seamoby-car-discovery-issues-01.txt
>during the last call period, but perhaps I missed it. If you have any
>comments,
>please send them out within the next day.
>
>Also note that we are talking here about the problem statement, not the
>requirements.
>I have noted a thread over the last couple days on requirements, and
>your comments, will
>naturally be taken into account when the requirements draft is done.
>
>                 jak
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Hesham Soliman (ERA)" <hesham.soliman@era.ericsson.se>
>To: "'James Kempf'" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>; <seamoby@ietf.org>
>Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:59 AM
>Subject: RE: [Seamoby] Status of WG Last Call
>
>
> >   >
> >   > WG Last call has expired on the following drafts:
> >   >
> >   > 1) draft-ietf-seamoby-context-transfer-problem-stat-04.txt
> >   > 2) draft-ietf-seamoby-ct-reqs-02.txt
> >   > 3) draft-ietf-seamoby-car-discovery-issues-01.txt
> >   > 4) draft-ietf-seamoby-paging-protocol-assessment-00.txt
> >   >
> >   > No comments were received on 1) and 3), they will now be sent to
>the
> >   > IESG for review.
> >
> > => Just a minute, we _are_ discussing comments on 3).
> > I've also made these comments in London.
> >
> > Hesham
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Seamoby mailing list
>Seamoby@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby