IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 30 September 2018 23:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002E312872C; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 16:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xeQCfeON3DHh; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 16:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE06D126CB6; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 16:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E6820090; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:09:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id CABBBAE0; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:09:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C757A3D6; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:09:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
cc: secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <153826253306.18743.9250084704876465818@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <153826253306.18743.9250084704876465818@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:09:47 -0400
Message-ID: <25732.1538348987@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/-Sr3YlhKojSEska7XglOmTVgrwU>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:09:52 -0000

Christian, thank you for the review.

I have opened issues for each of the points you raise so that we can better
keep track of your comments.  Please see:
     https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/issues

I think that we authors will consider if we need to clarify any text to deal
with your comments, and if so, we'll post those changes/diffs.

Otherwise, we'll start a sub-thread of this email for the various cases.
Should we continue to CC ietf@ietf.org, or will secdir + anima do?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email