Re: [sfc] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh/

[Linda Dunbar <[e-mail]>]

I have read the document and support the WGLC. I think the discussion of the encapsulation approach is very helpful.



Best Regards,

Linda Dunbar
发件人：JamesGuichard
收件人：James Guichard;[e-mail];
抄送人：[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>;
日 期 ：2021年09月03日 02:03
主 题 ：Re: [sfc] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh/
_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
Dear WG:

The chairs have extended the WGLC for a further 2 weeks due to the lack of feedback from the WG on the original WGLC.

Please read the document and provide comments to the SFC WG mailing list no later than September 17th 2021. Note that this document is a normative reference for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-transit<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-transit&data=04%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C66538d1748f44d91e3c408d970dd5539%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637664918188265564%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=NpIGn%2BgdM85tKquMfDdvaLxreZKj9Wiqhr5OCFmPms8%3D&reserved=0> that is currently in AD review and we would therefore like to conclude this WGLC so that its dependent documents can further progress.

Thanks!

Jim & Joel

From: James Guichard <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 8:32 AM
To: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh/

Dear WG:

This email starts a 2 week Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh [1].

Please read this document if you haven’t read the most recent version and send your comments to the SFC WG list no later than September 1st 2021.

If you are raising a point which you expect will be specifically debated on the mailing list, consider using a specific email/thread for this point.

Lastly, if you are an author or contributor please response to indicate whether you know of any undisclosed IPR related to this document.

Thanks!

Jim & Joel

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh/<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh%2F&data=04%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C66538d1748f44d91e3c408d970dd5539%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637664918188275525%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=ympSh8%2BKV5TN0ZoO%2BrbCwgXVfWdwlcau2nNLygITbNE%3D&reserved=0>