Re: [sfc] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh/

Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 10 September 2021 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08723A0B17; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 06:42:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mgvrejoP2PIw; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 06:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D51223A0B02; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 06:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id h16so4130698lfk.10; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 06:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EJhmR+85Xtn5iroYFLx3cV+pvqpXZQ9eXlsZdaQS1+A=; b=KJodOPniJ/cvDHtT4WffbeiCYtQk7Ne8SxyAshySuhEj3Pv2J6ksGGVoCDD2yjHIq1 p1Upp6VVliqV6GcspIyc0LshQBmaP/W5kEtw4ykKDOc16ovutLGOu2xVArXRj0CdIrkc iL9FtgUiGpZa0y7Uas4e8NwewzXA8pvc2w6f3nvfu04QGE94+LPaOm2rre+SDI/xJW5T tz1IAEIMBkV+BEUYP0CTY7mpRcR9sFXLoEN2j3uyP0AmYoHWkg6aOBvy1ewaoKmOytgb xfeC7Xsi0axzAXTV2ThA5r+/1TaD8hwDDuDSsUcZq+NHoxT8zXnifaG4SzeEjo2DIOb/ Ehvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EJhmR+85Xtn5iroYFLx3cV+pvqpXZQ9eXlsZdaQS1+A=; b=yQOJm7yVr/s4BNYRVgK8g125TH9zz5wrf10AHDLs9JlFowYpzVHfJ7QcSrUvl2b+SF ZeXWFQG4uUkAAlCafspRMfT3g43IlWl5/JJckN5CEGatXzCtkuWkhXkQXi3U7r70wh1b c8h/c1yDBh+SXjZxs/Jkx0vgNUDZEHgmMRF1Pya+lGPtXwYBP9mQt4GUbpwEaACDO/cH hLPjgWc7pUOelAhF9eNZ1i4Ht5YWQg4n4UUzbg59Oy1/7r3T5V5Uv9VfK65m1W2RTivg qGgJ2utDmJpHJcLdbEejVt68kKfXkP89Z6Y/LdRFfJYVbId4/JOzPihU8+MDesbnw+Js I8MQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ogy2OR19SScnR1XWNSx+U0UJAEe2OkillGP1D6PjTItfiJjS9 K8wlOk5rd2G3j7GADWR0vSZN0ncu4xszpk2mjBqwOY0R940l
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy/nvCoSnhBHQveczNVlRRgoQNK8HFRvRtzcsBxW3ZCvQYYiM+GOawCxXwdovOA9bE+qxIOW/SBOGKJU+30Df4=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:7601:: with SMTP id c1mr1896643lff.448.1631281333024; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 06:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MN2PR13MB4206C91446BA5FBBDA69E233D2FF9@MN2PR13MB4206.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB4206155A7BC3C9688D204235D2CE9@MN2PR13MB4206.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CO1PR11MB480473DB4D35DEF7045779B1D9D69@CO1PR11MB4804.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB480473DB4D35DEF7045779B1D9D69@CO1PR11MB4804.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:42:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMZsk6d0OWwuOrZMeU0CCHuLaQ5bgC+nNdNhthXEKcCEnLiQaA@mail.gmail.com>
To: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
Cc: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>, "sfc-chairs@ietf.org" <sfc-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000623bde05cba44834"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/sAcCzyr_63VrfT8zORb-xjE09hY>
Subject: Re: [sfc] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh/
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 13:42:25 -0000

Hi WG,



I have been following the draft as part of MPLS encapsulation for IOAM in
draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam.



I believe the document is ready to progress to the next step.



Thanks,

Rakesh


From: sfc <sfc-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of James Guichard
> Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 8:02 PM
> To: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>; sfc@ietf.org
> Cc: sfc-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [sfc] WGLC for
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh/
>
> Dear WG:
>
> The chairs have extended the WGLC for a further 2 weeks due to the lack of
> feedback from the WG on the original WGLC.
>
> Please read the document and provide comments to the SFC WG mailing list
> no later than September 17th 2021. Note that this document is a normative
> reference for
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-transit
> that is currently in AD review and we would therefore like to conclude this
> WGLC so that its dependent documents can further progress.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jim & Joel
>
> From: James Guichard <mailto:james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 8:32 AM
> To: mailto:sfc@ietf.org
> Cc: mailto:sfc-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: WGLC for
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh/
>
> Dear WG:
>
> This email starts a 2 week Working Group Last Call for
> draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh [1].
>
> Please read this document if you haven't read the most recent version and
> send your comments to the SFC WG list no later than September 1st 2021.
>
> If you are raising a point which you expect will be specifically debated
> on the mailing list, consider using a specific email/thread for this point.
>
> Lastly, if you are an author or contributor please response to indicate
> whether you know of any undisclosed IPR related to this document.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jim & Joel
>
> [1]
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C5d6bc76f69df4c2a8cdb08d962443814%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637648867414771153%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=YC18mVsN4Kfw%2BAP2OfZBWkj8jLGembb1HEXsR1vAzLo%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
>