IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] adopting alternate trust format in draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Wed, 25 August 2010 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DAC3A689B for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.483
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.483 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.116, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7vTn9PFrBJbe for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62FB3A6B60 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dommiel.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:37987 helo=[169.223.10.196]) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1OoPOA-000AgK-AB; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:28:14 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240807c89b564850eb@[169.223.10.196]>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1008250258010.5868@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1008250258010.5868@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:27:54 -0400
To: Sandra Murphy <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] adopting alternate trust format in draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:27:42 -0000

At 4:18 AM -0400 8/25/10, Sandra Murphy wrote:
>Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an 
>alternate trust anchor representation format from that proposed in 
>draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04.  This alternate format was discussed in the 
>sidr meeting in IETF78 in Maastricht.
>
>I am asking for comment on the list as to whether there is wg 
>consensus that draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04 should use the alternative 
>format.
>
>Please respond so that the authors can represent wg consensus in the 
>draft.  The call for consensus will end Sept 8.
>
>--Sandy

I am in favor of the WG switching to the simpler format, but only if 
the issues I raised on the list and at the meeting are addressed. 
Also, I would not characterize the question as you did above. Isn't 
the proposal for a (hopefully revised) version of Sam's draft to 
replace sidr-ta-04?

Steve

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email