IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] adopting alternate trust format in draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04

Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Tue, 14 September 2010 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968663A6B1A for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.059
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.059 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.540, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3BPmmBbxeAVO for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9215E3A6B00 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so7391285iwn.31 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OvgnFcvEHZrmiAqBPTUZva+7b4Dm6bMDq/WW2e0nzNE=; b=ZkyvChQHnH7xKO9po1FZp7xRXkRfN+qPEwnjVNktU2nX0/oobINU03kdOGBKCT1hZW iLl7arCkPIZpgXfk7tvNMjQbtjICiL9fCU9IW7ArYr43mBE8x7bUnd8yaQdoa9VJU6qy WBbOplxbhAvV9nNsOCeDw4bue7Qw0Oj9Eo9Mc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ESeb7Ef7KK5yokNodpt7lIIZCxsqi7pwf7CtCxMN4M0XGUo9Pon0+b4LHYFLqOUqSf oKHO4JV7tdQSs8PhXIg002mXEyuT8IjQJreQEh+NS/f6gSCI6mAfFLyXYazzdU5zlJ2K craIM6IOLun09yVMRvPYj5Cslo8HAOgpG5BOk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.161.16 with SMTP id p16mr331270ibx.61.1284490961863; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.117.155 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8595AFE1-F7FC-4F1D-8BEF-142123084E06@kumari.net>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1008250258010.5868@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <8595AFE1-F7FC-4F1D-8BEF-142123084E06@kumari.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:02:41 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: DDfbhs87ShGT7FBto2Ld-KmHZtM
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=ig8zEacGK5eK8Bm0LROOL4QwFvSH1Bfe_Zs=L@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Sandra Murphy <sandra.murphy@sparta.com>, sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] adopting alternate trust format in draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:02:24 -0000

It seems that the alt-doc has some revising to be done though adoption
by the WG seems like the right path here. Some author-author
discussion is being done, with some doc updates. I think the WG wants
this to be at LC in/before Bejing. We have a month to do that work.

Unless there are complaints about this, please get a last rev in
before Bejing so it can start LC just before the meeting.

-Chris
(wg co-chair shoes on)

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>
> On Aug 25, 2010, at 4:18 AM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
>
>> Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an alternate
>> trust anchor representation format from that proposed in
>> draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04.  This alternate format was discussed in the sidr
>> meeting in IETF78 in Maastricht.
>>
>> I am asking for comment on the list as to whether there is wg consensus
>> that draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04 should use the alternative format.
>
> Yup.
>
>>
>> Please respond so that the authors can represent wg consensus in the
>> draft.  The call for consensus will end Sept 8.
>>
>> --Sandy
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sidr mailing list
>> sidr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>
> --
> Never criticize a man till you've walked a mile in his shoes.  Then if he
> didn't like what you've said, he's a mile away and barefoot.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email