Re: [sidr] adopting alternate trust format in draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04

Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org> Wed, 25 August 2010 23:24 UTC

Return-Path: <terry.manderson@icann.org>
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187063A6B46 for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.124
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.124 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.475, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yw8SKnI3aSVe for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org (expfe100-2.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.237]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224463A6A35 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.237]) with mapi; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:24:37 -0700
From: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
To: Sandra Murphy <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:24:36 -0700
Thread-Topic: [sidr] adopting alternate trust format in draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04
Thread-Index: ActELzIZtTTcGP5DRW+DeTHy95+SUgAfXw5z
Message-ID: <C89BE354.6C4C%terry.manderson@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1008250425060.5868@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [sidr] adopting alternate trust format in draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:24:05 -0000

I support the use of this alternative format.

Cheers
Terry


On 25/08/10 6:25 PM, "Sandra Murphy" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com> wrote:

> Forgot to add the obligatory coda:
> 
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Sandra Murphy wrote:
> 
>> Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an alternate
>> trust anchor representation format from that proposed in
>> draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04.  This alternate format was discussed in the sidr
>> meeting in IETF78 in Maastricht.
>> 
>> I am asking for comment on the list as to whether there is wg consensus that
>> draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04 should use the alternative format.
>> 
>> Please respond so that the authors can represent wg consensus in the draft.
>> The call for consensus will end Sept 8.
>> 
>> --Sandy
> 
>    --Sandy, speaking as wg chair
> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> sidr mailing list
>> sidr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr