IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] adopting alternate trust format in draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 30 August 2010 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0733A69D3 for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.37
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.37 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.229, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kf-mKYPXas-p for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.kumari.net (smtp.kumari.net [216.177.58.220]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D5F3A69C0 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp.kumari.net (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 2E4D9DEE002; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:24:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dot.her.corp.google.com (unknown [74.202.225.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.kumari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84A43DEE001; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:24:55 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <8595AFE1-F7FC-4F1D-8BEF-142123084E06@kumari.net>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: Sandra Murphy <sandra.murphy@sparta.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1008250258010.5868@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:26:41 -0400
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1008250258010.5868@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] adopting alternate trust format in draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:26:12 -0000

On Aug 25, 2010, at 4:18 AM, Sandra Murphy wrote:

> Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an  
> alternate trust anchor representation format from that proposed in  
> draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04.  This alternate format was discussed in the  
> sidr meeting in IETF78 in Maastricht.
>
> I am asking for comment on the list as to whether there is wg  
> consensus that draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04 should use the alternative  
> format.

Yup.

>
> Please respond so that the authors can represent wg consensus in the  
> draft.  The call for consensus will end Sept 8.
>
> --Sandy
>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

-- 
Never criticize a man till you've walked a mile in his shoes.  Then if  
he didn't like what you've said, he's a mile away and barefoot.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email