IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] adopting alternate trust format in draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04

Sandra Murphy <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com> Wed, 25 August 2010 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <Sandra.Murphy@cobham.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF4E3A6AA7 for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.451
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.451 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.148, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 688n9OffR32J for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from M4.sparta.com (M4.sparta.com [157.185.61.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757603A6A96 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id o7P8PVZb015167 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 03:25:31 -0500
Received: from mailbin2.ads.sparta.com (mailbin.sparta.com [157.185.85.6]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7P8PVYs015683 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 03:25:31 -0500
Received: from SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([10.71.0.201]) by mailbin2.ads.sparta.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:25:31 -0400
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:25:30 -0400
From: Sandra Murphy <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
To: sidr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1008250258010.5868@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1008250425060.5868@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1008250258010.5868@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
X-X-Sender: sandy@mailbin.sparta.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Aug 2010 08:25:31.0056 (UTC) FILETIME=[14A2DB00:01CB442F]
Subject: Re: [sidr] adopting alternate trust format in draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:25:00 -0000

Forgot to add the obligatory coda:

On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Sandra Murphy wrote:

> Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an alternate 
> trust anchor representation format from that proposed in 
> draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04.  This alternate format was discussed in the sidr 
> meeting in IETF78 in Maastricht.
>
> I am asking for comment on the list as to whether there is wg consensus that 
> draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04 should use the alternative format.
>
> Please respond so that the authors can represent wg consensus in the draft. 
> The call for consensus will end Sept 8.
>
> --Sandy

   --Sandy, speaking as wg chair

>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email