IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05

"Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com> Fri, 21 September 2012 23:26 UTC

Return-Path: <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477DB21E8037 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.423
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.423 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.176, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aBtRJYkKNpNv for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from M4.sparta.com (M4.sparta.com [157.185.61.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF5121E8034 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8LNQdaB025026; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:26:39 -0500
Received: from Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([157.185.80.107]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8LNQcGW004318; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:26:39 -0500
Received: from HERMES.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([fe80::e4a8:a383:2128:c0e5]) by Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([fe80::e4a8:a383:2128:c0e5%21]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 19:27:45 -0400
From: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
To: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "alexey.melnikov@isode.com" <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05
Thread-Index: Ac2TN5E+gtWY3jVQTo2aIJ20K9PIbgEKBiOAAEJH9ID//8xkPg==
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 23:27:45 +0000
Message-ID: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F7BFF7@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F706AF@CMA-MB003.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <EB8264B4-5C6A-4877-BA7B-034C95E7605B@tcb.net>, <6D70F892-6696-488D-9EBB-B23C6327C3A3@tcb.net>
In-Reply-To: <6D70F892-6696-488D-9EBB-B23C6327C3A3@tcb.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.185.63.137]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org wg" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 23:26:43 -0000

The protocol, threats and requirements documents are definitely tied together and will progress together.  The three documents have been in the working group for the same length of time, so you'd think that they, being so tied, would have had equal attention and be equally mature.

On the non-process, reality side of things:  The newest protocol draft came out on 7 Sep and I asked the working group to "look at this draft right away" because it would be discussed at the interim meeting.  After eight days with no comments, a wglc seemed a good idea.  Sad that our lives need a wglc to produce participation, but it is what it is.

--Sandy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email