IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05

Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> Sat, 22 September 2012 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB3921F8501 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x5-X3KLg5UpG for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2443721F84D7 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibcb5 with SMTP id cb5so2069194wib.1 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1eO9gHw30Q4DHGJ3xyR051x0avp9zMZKTjgZrDm72sk=; b=jafkOxeZ4dhNWeuFmnxX5y+hiKysrvvxvRpDGXLHujUiHIIvuAEirOaSh6sMzif8pd aQw2A59G+jdjhGvWxCEk7p77NLy863jSm/NECBFFSFZddr6SOlRmSfkboRlfYZdOOJE0 jsxJrpyAyKMrd1woscRbbLB6g+O9MFtKUnJMYl0Cpi6GDadxISIJ5iZzIf7CgYIedf/6 KpGuflvc+8qh8t1SL3So4ghipZ3oEFW3n4uVXaWy7hoWftskFMzMi3ax26vWKTTaPRo3 QzscKDdAZ0fuG4w14OKrIUsnhjrFEa2PzFH0kGMCLweDtlimsaays0Pmg+KRlnQmqnmT oU+Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.145.88 with SMTP id o66mr3797383wej.169.1348273727276; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.145.133 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaZqpM0DMOjQdESzQudZ5n1f7jESx0qK8E6=N=jpVnv1Xg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F706AF@CMA-MB003.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <EB8264B4-5C6A-4877-BA7B-034C95E7605B@tcb.net> <6D70F892-6696-488D-9EBB-B23C6327C3A3@tcb.net> <CAL9jLaZs=Q5ZaWKHjBh8hgUy8hiJcs_h1e_KRvsTuFtPt4_1NQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCiq-U-_5OgQbHwLqfSnx+cWtxJ5XNg7Ok9oxFEsJ1e7QMw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaZqpM0DMOjQdESzQudZ5n1f7jESx0qK8E6=N=jpVnv1Xg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:28:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CAH1iCirBLeZVBWQv8L6ECW_Nzx1LwObRL_5+oUfqxXwzuD_Rug@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e6d646a69308bb04ca3f7024"
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sidr@ietf.org wg" <sidr@ietf.org>, Sandra Murphy <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 00:28:49 -0000

Discussion yes, revisions, not so much, and in particular, -threats is not
done. WGLC is inappropriate prior to -threats completion in WG.

Plus, -threats has not adequately accommodated criticism. Doing
s/BGPSEC/ANOTHER_NAME/g does not qualify as "substantive", IMHO.

There was no review post -05 publication. Review prior to that point is not
relevant, IMHO.

At a minimum, those whose comments were in theory addressed, should be
given the opportunity, each and every one of them, to speak up and be heard.

It is the job of the chairs to track issues and confirm with commentators
that revisions are adequate.

I am not a chair.

Brian

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com
> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Brian Dickson
> <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't believe it is at all appropriate to WGLC a document prior to
> > substantive review and maturity.
>
> it's on it's 5th revision, with substantive discussion along the way...
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email