IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05

Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> Sat, 22 September 2012 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <danny@tcb.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C1521F86AA for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MLUjJ-ximSUW for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dog.tcb.net (dog.tcb.net [64.78.150.133]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF6921F8584 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dog.tcb.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id 074B42680C7; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 11:55:16 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from dul1dmcphers-m2.home (pool-71-171-124-149.clppva.fios.verizon.net [71.171.124.149]) (authenticated-user smtp) (TLSv1/SSLv3 AES128-SHA 128/128) by dog.tcb.net with SMTP; for sidr@ietf.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 11:55:15 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from danny@tcb.net)
X-Avenger: version=0.7.8; receiver=dog.tcb.net; client-ip=71.171.124.149; client-port=53769; syn-fingerprint=65535:48:1:64:M1460,N,W1,N,N,T,S MacOS 10.4.8; data-bytes=0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
In-Reply-To: <m27grmhp8a.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:55:05 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D738805E-3AB7-4377-A5BD-662B70A74553@tcb.net>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F706AF@CMA-MB003.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <EB8264B4-5C6A-4877-BA7B-034C95E7605B@tcb.net> <m27grmhp8a.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: sidr wg <sidr@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:55:17 -0000

On Sep 21, 2012, at 8:32 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

> i note that you got one actual reivew, which is good.  the only other
> stuff i have seen is people telling the chairs what the process should
> be, embarrassing. 

I concur - the stated fact that we're still awaiting revisions to the threats document and the requirements draft has long-standing unaddressed comments and the protocol document is being WG last called -- it is indeed embarrassing.

Given the potential array of implications of work here, as well as the climate surrounding Internet governance and the global stability of the routing system, open standards development and transparency, we ought to have the good sense to follow our own processes.  If solutions champions want less friction take it to the IRTF and make it EXPERIMENTAL...

Feeling a bit like "the wall" here [1]....

-danny


[1] http://archive.psg.com/051000.ccr-ivtf.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email