IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] adoption call for draft-kent-sidr-adverse-actions-02

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 30 March 2016 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5486212D828 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ecMdTqqoK76 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2256B12D827 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1alK22-00081Y-Dm; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:35:50 +0000
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:35:49 -0300
Message-ID: <m2h9fnuave.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <56FBE234.7090703@bbn.com>
References: <513BC696-168B-48A6-94EC-B0CD4B3292EC@icloud.com> <002885DC-BD79-47C4-A069-7F86269549B6@tislabs.com> <613CF604-76EC-4901-90D7-1DBB5A606946@ripe.net> <56FBE234.7090703@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/R74ow3l87eX4-x3fqNiPy1SB8oQ>
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] adoption call for draft-kent-sidr-adverse-actions-02
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:35:54 -0000

> That's a fair point. Are you suggesting that we create a separate doc
> to enumerate vulnerabilities in the IRR context, or that we add a
> section to this doc to describe, in less detail, such vulnerabilities?

for each scary point, just compare to existing irr tech.  i.e. "this is
the same problem as irr has," or "this ameliorates some of the following
irr problem."

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email