Re: [sidr] adoption call for draft-kent-sidr-adverse-actions-02

"Carlos M. Martinez" <carlosm3011@gmail.com> Wed, 30 March 2016 12:55 UTC

Return-Path: <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D39012E1F9 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RyBOUVyoAF9K for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x233.google.com (mail-qg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FA7B12E305 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-x233.google.com with SMTP id w104so32367391qge.3 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GShXNWlvDMjyxt0Wlz1aDJBnOOFLQSGJCCL8w2qBX/w=; b=olqLJYO8LY5mCP5O+HcoC+gLn5OL6Phbdbpsfjew2Y8nAIl+EljVTxquxoCP+zO65g GrTr0IsmCt43lcxAETEHWuwdEvzrrQgCR2f5r40QEMS3h0KU4cx602N7OOlTyeaLX1CR ly2v+n13NHiHIzekwlEAvijtEtF3oC14/PDCdXY7H0zRoQbzifcOXstLuim/VRUiVNAW gAJCnPuXOtfhd72XLczbMlBsZ1j1cuy66UZETVJIKdnNPGCm1ofOQQ/V7sEgU8+satyU Dvn92V2Cfc59LDAzqMJRLyKiLmkFWbnqo9c2ZUSiCGkgQUO8J9ek+UMgzk45FaNLsPCB xLxw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GShXNWlvDMjyxt0Wlz1aDJBnOOFLQSGJCCL8w2qBX/w=; b=ZkuNmQb/mLuA9HNHhG/ZoNdMX9sCcQSAX0/2203dzGiV0GjUb63syPpS6d9AiFCG3y zkVPBIDDoOq+50WaRTjHJQoVeCdDb49xCutNQiNZuAygSIF78qRZPuodicZVrT1zRjgo 96+xFwpjXi3E5AhjXwX1GHc9NKYXol0ZzAgbaGNXtotWITberC+ZZnqR0Nj2NxnXDoi2 DJHsxIP73DuDUzao67Gu+Of9HMdKyn8v+yghK7nBKyNkBTi5F96/TXMyB57nd6a0lNzf r1yf8+haQzVvrC1xkfgtvBluKr/AiguLc4ERvef5PNNkNOLjAPczUYY9jJ2qKsUVSKet wBcA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJI/tULynK3NEIrZ50WTsekDDmgIds3MIngK4bXjg+t00Y+DkpklWVn0NRb7rH12rA==
X-Received: by 10.140.237.204 with SMTP id i195mr10017518qhc.55.1459341889180; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:7000:24f9:cb4a:d921:5669? ([2001:13c7:7001:7000:24f9:cb4a:d921:5669]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f24sm1676423qkf.6.2016.03.30.05.44.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
References: <513BC696-168B-48A6-94EC-B0CD4B3292EC@icloud.com> <002885DC-BD79-47C4-A069-7F86269549B6@tislabs.com> <613CF604-76EC-4901-90D7-1DBB5A606946@ripe.net> <m2d1qdueyt.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
From: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <56FBCA3D.60400@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:44:45 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m2d1qdueyt.wl%randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/ZO2HyeMC0wS3_cUMVjwMas9ybMo>
Cc: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>, sidr <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] adoption call for draft-kent-sidr-adverse-actions-02
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: carlos@lacnic.net
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:55:33 -0000

+1

On 3/29/16 6:55 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> I do have one remaining concern, but I hope that this can be
>> addressed: this document can be perceived as proof of 'all the things
>> wrong / scary' about RPKI used for origin validation and/or
>> BGPSec. However, to my knowledge, there is no similar analysis of
>> adverse actions to IRRs. Most of the same problems exist there - and
>> far worse: RPs do not have the benefit of object security so they
>> would be largely unaware. I think it would be counterproductive if
>> this wasn't clear, and the document is abused to make a point for
>> being better of with simple IRR.
> 
> this has bothered me.  thank you for expressing it far better than i
> could
> 
> randy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>