IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] New Version Notification for draft-ymbk-sidr-transfer-00.txt

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Fri, 17 July 2015 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4E01B33E5 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 06:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36bfKE-LZDiY for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 06:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD9181B33E7 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 06:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ssh.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:54719 helo=COMSEC.home) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1ZG5sE-000OXF-OQ for sidr@ietf.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:40:22 -0400
References: <20150530231211.10362.50102.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2lhg33u84.wl%randy@psg.com> <556CF530.4010408@ops-netman.net> <m27frn3qye.wl%randy@psg.com> <87F5B607-2ECC-4C54-A8D8-D8CE5F587F07@tislabs.com> <559A8B31.50408@bbn.com> <m2vbdw24mv.wl%randy@psg.com> <559BF347.60609@bbn.com> <9DFC9C7C-CBFC-427C-8589-C13457EDD091@tislabs.com> <55A6C585.6060602@bbn.com> <8BE719A0-0EC1-4E35-8BAD-A64E06D0979C@arin.net> <55A7B814.1020509@bbn.com> <6FD0DC29-9169-44D7-9152-2F1C0E0458A1@arin.net>
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Message-ID: <55A905C6.7050904@bbn.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:40:22 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6FD0DC29-9169-44D7-9152-2F1C0E0458A1@arin.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010902080702000700070903"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/Unle9Tww8_X-6XA_zRu3vRfHoGY>
Subject: Re: [sidr] New Version Notification for draft-ymbk-sidr-transfer-00.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:40:25 -0000

Andy,


> ...
> Steve,
>
> Given what I said initially in this thread, I thought we were talking 
> about the same thing. I guess not. We could tease this apart, but is 
> it worth it if “Randy’s view” covers all situations?
>
> -andy
Randy's approach covers both cases, at the cost of some added complexity 
for what I suspect
is the most common case. Whether that's preferable to two similar, but 
slightly different
mechanisms, where one is optimized for the (purported) most common case 
is a matter of
engineering taste. The WG will have to decide at some point, when we 
have complete, detailed
proposals for both.

Steve

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email