IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WG adoption call for draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-impl-01.txt

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 23 January 2012 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F023321F871E for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:23:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.082, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q-BCFTvlvcLn for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:23:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9482821F86CA for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:23:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1RpLjn-000KdQ-B7; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:23:15 +0000
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:23:14 +0900
Message-ID: <m2d3aal9y5.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <041CAC39-1FAE-465F-847B-C8E171CF14EE@kumari.net>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F60756D3@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <041CAC39-1FAE-465F-847B-C8E171CF14EE@kumari.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG adoption call for draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-impl-01.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:23:17 -0000

> Support adoption.

thank you

> Comments:
> It is unclear (to me) what exactly was mean by "YES" vs "UNIT TEST" vs
> "SYS TEST" -- I could make some guesses, but a definition would be
> nice.

while i share your puzzlement (and i am an author!:-), shouldn't this
be deferred until we have agreed it is a wg document?

[ not meaning to pick on you warren.  but i have been shocked at some
  wgs (e.g. v6ops) months of nit picking of a document which the wg has
  not even agreed to accept as a work item. ]

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email