Re: [Sidrops] [WGLC] draft-ietf-sidrops-roa-considerations-01 - Ends 10/March/2022

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 10 March 2022 12:07 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB943A0DB5 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 04:07:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZyknoJQOjZ2B for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 04:07:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3CDA3A0C77 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 04:07:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1nSHZn-0003nQ-7y; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:07:27 +0000
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 04:07:26 -0800
Message-ID: <m2r17a80zl.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Ties de Kock <tdekock@ripe.net>
Cc: "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>, Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <8961B085-5022-49C8-8775-77031B3DD814@ripe.net>
References: <BYAPR18MB26961DE9F15501CCA12ECCF1C13D9@BYAPR18MB2696.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> <851649A5-9075-4956-8B57-E51F612DF6BD@nlnetlabs.nl> <m235jqa2fk.wl-randy@psg.com> <D46FDA88-15E2-4EC6-BE07-0A1A93038B64@ripe.net> <m2v8wm8278.wl-randy@psg.com> <8961B085-5022-49C8-8775-77031B3DD814@ripe.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/-we3yxRHVAqzd5fOfCuvROKiMPI>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] [WGLC] draft-ietf-sidrops-roa-considerations-01 - Ends 10/March/2022
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:07:33 -0000

>> the CA, in some thought of saving bandwidth or something, packs data
>> up into AS-based blobs which the RPs are then supposed to unpack and
>> reconcile.  where's the win that is worth all that work?
> 
> “less objects, smaller”
> 
> It sounds like an attractive optimisation on paper.

"Premature optimization is the root of all evil (or at least most of it)
in programming.”  -- D Knuth

> I would need benchmark results (with a rir-sized repo with
> 1-vrp-one-ROA) to see how much it does in practice.

i think one would want to measure whole system, from CA repo to the
router

> My mental model: The RPKI is a directed rooted forest. From a single
> point of view, for all CAs, you see a consistent snapshot for a CA (or
> encounter a failed fetch).

[ s/for all/for each/ ? ]

> If there are no split views on the repository content, RPs will
> eventually see the same updates.

except the CA PPs publish asynchronously, on varied schedules, etc.

and the RPs fetch asynchronously.

and the routers ...

randy