IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] question on draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification-04

Thomas King <thomas.king@de-cix.net> Fri, 05 June 2020 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas.king@de-cix.net>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8E23A0879 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 10:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5B_B21K8vcFU for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 10:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de-cix.net (relay3.de-cix.net [46.31.121.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78B913A0878 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 10:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
IronPort-SDR: rLuum/Xlua1ewnvNNq7R08+Zxw26ZzjguY/65HzJcVZQmR3LkmkEUNFGyhQfoU+xkD3kHyiaRM 415mKq0ipXW+BWYL1CAbQerqULNZrZ2uQ4h4qhUUGE3fiOg9BB2EXCTKdF2m2ATveLSgWjCk7P QvVIoGeREHIuVi9EeUW1iRGW9eBtSSsXzMv5rz92fwyyaMGpUV2CUbowEtVArisr/mrUmnFxdj WTmfqp4J+TB+Do6m2dn6HJfk124gytqLwtVqafen2aYQlzMyn/jo3LwsG9/WZdqBV7M2n/Vomc bo8=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,477,1583190000"; d="p7s'?scan'208";a="25079504"
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp02.de-cix.net) ([192.168.65.11]) by mailgw013.de-cix.net with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2020 19:07:45 +0200
Received: from EX03.for-the-inter.net (ex03.for-the-inter.net [192.168.49.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp02.de-cix.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B884576; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 19:07:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EX02.for-the-inter.net (192.168.49.20) by EX03.for-the-inter.net (192.168.49.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 19:07:44 +0200
Received: from EX02.for-the-inter.net ([fe80::1cb2:801e:f870:7df9]) by EX02.for-the-inter.net ([fe80::1cb2:801e:f870:7df9%4]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.010; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 19:07:44 +0200
From: Thomas King <thomas.king@de-cix.net>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
CC: SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>, Alexander Azimov <a.e.azimov@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Sidrops] question on draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification-04
Thread-Index: AQHWJzMspK1DECvmgkusy65qsSryTqiizLAAgAEcogCABTIogIAHbCuAgBmkE4CAABVAgIAAA0QAgAAlBIA=
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 17:07:44 +0000
Message-ID: <48E73C17-BB15-442A-B003-FDDE22E094F5@de-cix.net>
References: <C01B0098369B2D4391851938DA6700B7179F9EAB@dggeml512-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CAEGSd=APMCnnd5mrnMKtti-QWy1m7r5JfJsf7HynZqyXWwsZHg@mail.gmail.com> <C01B0098369B2D4391851938DA6700B717A0C386@DGGEML532-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CAEGSd=Bk3Lgte1L0KKP_GU+ieDpETvLk1JTVTLZTv-Z5NrVUoQ@mail.gmail.com> <C01B0098369B2D4391851938DA6700B717A28020@DGGEML532-MBX.china.huawei.com> <24249.23930.126312.2484@oz.mt.att.com> <C01B0098369B2D4391851938DA6700B717A2CABA@DGGEML532-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CAEGSd=AbOu88VBqjR90+O1H39Pq-1cf+xRb971tZXxSLmL8Ntw@mail.gmail.com> <C01B0098369B2D4391851938DA6700B717A35EC8@DGGEML532-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CAEGSd=Dorh5dNaxdS73YaeJXv+5iHBf3B2GbzkE9_5N3fsN3iQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2zh9hzcne.wl-randy@psg.com> <62d49f7b-d709-78c3-9eaf-1770a0d59495@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: <62d49f7b-d709-78c3-9eaf-1770a0d59495@foobar.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.140.8]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha256"; boundary="B_3674228864_1156395410"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/BenS2vqZXFwMTiIGGFp6O1Rk_o0>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] question on draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification-04
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 17:07:51 -0000

+1

I can't name a single IXP doing it, however, rumor has it that it still exists. Probably some research on this topic would make sense to collect some facts?

Best regards,
Thomas

On 05.06.20, 18:55, "Sidrops on behalf of Nick Hilliard" <sidrops-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of nick@foobar.org> wrote:

    Randy Bush wrote on 05/06/2020 17:43:
    > are there really still layer three ixen which put their as in the path?
    > i thought that we finally stomped that out 15-20 years ago.

    I've heard there's a handful of organisations still doing this, but it's 
    a rarity and is dying out.  It would not be productive to build this 
    assumption into any new policy protocol development.

    Nick

    _______________________________________________
    Sidrops mailing list
    Sidrops@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email