Re: [Sidrops] question on draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification-04

Melchior Aelmans <melchior@aelmans.eu> Sat, 06 June 2020 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <melchior@aelmans.eu>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E1B3A0A68 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 08:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=aelmans-eu.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mkxrKm1NGtHH for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 08:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com (mail-wm1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42ADD3A0542 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 08:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id v19so11050315wmj.0 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 08:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aelmans-eu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HeRgb7PvQJH5PhDKUyJupfHk77dinm6CBBkAQLMu1h8=; b=U1E3visn03VMzR2w9uWY1uilhOCIg3aBhwrAEwM8FyMRa8NKLYH+FnBYIOKmH6syRJ WXESyto63tSIcMg/2jDX9cpG3k3kz4KxAo/tn32QiiwWwh1muGpzKuoQrAURbVhx0Hoh sUMUgbkkr2sCty4WO2tFjxVSEvdNzgI7xHhGA9dhBR13HmvxuLUGBlo9PiXykj1FUHG3 0ADRBmG/hf2yvBWkv2TXAzlcXVyDJcesRlfyk2UK/x8qZkdpfRpauWfObACY5QVVNqd0 Hr/tYClDDNhkQMeiT0kJ6AVSAvH+QaZ+aySGQC5KcB0Dn1+OM6btqc5RYthKDH8txClp mMvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HeRgb7PvQJH5PhDKUyJupfHk77dinm6CBBkAQLMu1h8=; b=Q7WvcmEUst2F2TlYjsRHSbvdiVFRGVWLUTkZL2wIwN934QGTCYtqhi8WfXYNznF36m tn77ZfrANwTGt+NSHllk+wpxX+TcF0hxFCHhRAghU8eyBJpLjUAnFa63UyEyoYpX0QaK 3akaR6jN/Db/2uYwk+mhdH4WqONzaJbXDdY1hyWfVswWActW0NnrEoSbewP5DVyMJD81 ZtLHpMwyJHvP2KhRL83BrotXQ/TMiYUHeohI2Cd3TiVlNSzDX7s7CER2QcgLXP28MQBV hWo91ihl+PIerPiGLzpNHTWPJWomrAbxJF6LvZ1fvYfBVOOYfMqZj7ZJJmvx+kzso6sr kSAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532HESOng9/h/TvF/4QVXDlXd/kCihtZDxj8oR3o3gmN4TjyLqI0 A+7cjwscNLRJeDhS/beYIkkyxIpCETxLUk7Ruted6w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx77YK8snJBr25/Zezd268CoronbG5617lhximf/N7cTFsTzAj5+aOZpsLQU8hfQy/FfXI1WafgtLCOERM6NwE=
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:ce15:: with SMTP id m21mr7833396wmc.117.1591456513406; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 08:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <C01B0098369B2D4391851938DA6700B7179F9EAB@dggeml512-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CAEGSd=APMCnnd5mrnMKtti-QWy1m7r5JfJsf7HynZqyXWwsZHg@mail.gmail.com> <C01B0098369B2D4391851938DA6700B717A0C386@DGGEML532-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CAEGSd=Bk3Lgte1L0KKP_GU+ieDpETvLk1JTVTLZTv-Z5NrVUoQ@mail.gmail.com> <C01B0098369B2D4391851938DA6700B717A28020@DGGEML532-MBX.china.huawei.com> <24249.23930.126312.2484@oz.mt.att.com> <C01B0098369B2D4391851938DA6700B717A2CABA@DGGEML532-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CAEGSd=AbOu88VBqjR90+O1H39Pq-1cf+xRb971tZXxSLmL8Ntw@mail.gmail.com> <C01B0098369B2D4391851938DA6700B717A35EC8@DGGEML532-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CAEGSd=Dorh5dNaxdS73YaeJXv+5iHBf3B2GbzkE9_5N3fsN3iQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2zh9hzcne.wl-randy@psg.com> <62d49f7b-d709-78c3-9eaf-1770a0d59495@foobar.org> <m2wo4lzb42.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2wo4lzb42.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Melchior Aelmans <melchior@aelmans.eu>
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 17:15:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CALxNLBigrBRWMzPGE45r=CBapvUc+OvgpV_hXcZJ7fQiGUP3zQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>, Alexander Azimov <a.e.azimov@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000284d0405a76bd895"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/LOp2zr3vFOD_aWbsqHeLn3av6ao>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] question on draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification-04
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 15:15:22 -0000

Hi,

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 7:16 PM Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> >> are there really still layer three ixen which put their as in the
> >> path?  i thought that we finally stomped that out 15-20 years ago.
> >
> > I've heard there's a handful of organisations still doing this, but
> > it's a rarity and is dying out.  It would not be productive to build
> > this assumption into any new policy protocol development.
>
> then i suggest we not add complexity in the document for this dead
> corner case.
>

I'm not aware of any IXPs doing this so I would support not adding this.

Cheers,
Melchior