Re: [Sidrops] WGLC = draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification - ENDS 03/22/2023 (Mar 22 2023)

["Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Nan,

Thank you for giving the draft a good read and for your valuable feedback and discussion here and also off-list.

>Thank Sriram. The draft was given a major update and reads well. I also support advancing the draft.

>IMO, although the problem shown in Figure 3 is unlikely to occur, it does possibly occur (inadvertently or intentionally). It would be better if the problem can be fixed. Another problem is how ASPA can work better when the registration data is scarce. I'm just throwing my thoughts out for discussion. I think they do not need to be resolved in this draft even they really matter.

One thing that can be noted here is that ASPA verification would offer a lot of benefit even with only the global ISPs and major regional ISPs registering ASPAs.  
 
>Nit-picking:
>1. The title of Figure 1 : Hop Check Function --> Hop-check function 2. "not Provider" --> "Not Provider"; "no Attestation" --> "No Attestation"
>3. Sec. 12, "{{AS(5), AS(3) ..." and "{{AS(5), AS(1)...", where "{{" -->"{"

Goof catches/suggestions. Will fix these in the next version -13.

Sriram