Re: [Sidrops] request for call for Working Group adoption draft-spaghetti-sidrops-rpki-validation-update

Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl> Wed, 10 March 2021 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4153A0CB8 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:28:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.82
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OJ_F23jTDmGa for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:28:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outbound.soverin.net (outbound.soverin.net [116.202.65.215]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF7E73A0CB7 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:28:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.3.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AAFC602E2; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:28:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [159.69.232.142]) by soverin.net
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=soverin; t=1615386517; bh=r/WMNoW3VlHQ2lDuvmi0eeI5/5TwEl1ZnWcww5RCmdg=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=dbLjtYe/5cTofxLeko4k80tLirYBN12KX/X3IKmfyOOTKP0sYOxmZKqpwZ64nc+/Z /g0Sa4QRl8BHLIX0IXjGwPeZj71CZqGlSUmM4ErgcU//tbKVdq44/FhEFIEHjRG9we RthJJQy6Q064XHtnr10MKnllkRjEyoY57yZSxuJk+10eCrzIxfl41V1tkJbcwXL+zP MBwiDGWyNobvURMsqVFHBEn0sSr5gs741+ixE8qhW7z3ule/VOe8TSaGAe84BO6dQY K12aCHEmO3sAEPXCCTyuLkFeM4myCnBzmFN+b/2deLqlRVwdmDi3yMbSB0FDCOS/NI 00IbkPzGFANkw==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <m2pn07gl6g.wl-randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:28:35 +0100
Cc: Job Snijders <job=40fastly.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, sidrops@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8C9F78C3-C968-42F4-A89B-B704888B5B43@nlnetlabs.nl>
References: <YEjILk/5hwwX/x9P@snel> <m2pn07gl6g.wl-randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/_GoGbZ-RQQQQRCTIDYduXB9SeHo>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] request for call for Working Group adoption draft-spaghetti-sidrops-rpki-validation-update
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:28:45 -0000

Hi,

> On 10 Mar 2021, at 15:03, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> 
>> I'd like to request the chairs to consider initiating a call for working
>> group adoption of draft-spaghetti-sidrops-rpki-validation-update
> 
> this is a protocol change and a serious one, and hence does not belong
> in an ops group

Perhaps, but the same can be said about a number of adopted documents.

There is a need to do work, and no clear indication as to where else. So, perhaps a re-charter/move should be considered. In the meantime this was not an objection to taking on other work (aspa, RTA, RSC, prefer-rrdp), so why should it be now?

Tim

> randy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sidrops mailing list
> Sidrops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops