Re: [Simple] Internal WG Review: Recharter of SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions (simple)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 31 January 2007 03:42 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HC6MR-000856-Oq; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:42:15 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HC6MQ-00084q-Cw for simple@ietf.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:42:14 -0500
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com ([72.232.15.10] helo=nostrum.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HC6MO-000783-Qn for simple@ietf.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:42:14 -0500
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (adsl-68-94-3-195.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [68.94.3.195]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0V3g9ne014356 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:42:10 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
In-Reply-To: <66cd252f0701301743ycc944cfhbee8817f21aa506b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E1HC0bx-0006P1-FG@ietf.org> <45BFC36C.4060304@cisco.com> <B35D3E34-63D5-49B2-A739-27F04C35026A@nostrum.com> <66cd252f0701301743ycc944cfhbee8817f21aa506b@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <1E3C1F6F-1497-4C1E-9336-934665BD9F87@nostrum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: [Simple] Internal WG Review: Recharter of SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions (simple)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:42:10 -0600
To: Hisham Khartabil <hisham.khartabil@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 68.94.3.195 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 86f85b2f88b0d50615aed44a7f9e33c7
Cc: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>, simple@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions <simple.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/simple>
List-Post: <mailto:simple@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: simple-bounces@ietf.org
No, the June milestone is fine with me. I just wanted to make sure we didn't forget it. I did not originally make the connection, but it makes sense on a re-read. On Jan 30, 2007, at 7:43 PM, Hisham Khartabil wrote: > I believe this was to be put into the June milestone. But I guess Ben > and Paul want to see it as one of the primary milestones listed. > > Regards, > Hisham > > On 31/01/07, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote: >> I also remember that being brought up, and also don't remember the >> outcome ;-) >> >> On Jan 30, 2007, at 4:15 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: >> >> > Wasn't there some talk of a need to specify how to choose between >> > MESSAGE and MSRP, and/or to transition between them in support of a >> > single conversation? >> > >> > E.g. send a MESSAGE because there may never be a conversation, but >> > then INVITE with an MSRP session to continue the conversation. The >> > need here would be for a way to tie these things together so it is >> > clear that they are part of the same conversation. There are >> > obviously issues with involving the same pair of UAs in both. >> > >> > I seem to recall this was discussed at some point, but I'm not sure >> > and if so I don't remember the outcome. >> > >> > Paul >> > >> > IESG Secretary wrote: >> >> A new charter for the SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence >> >> Leveraging >> >> Extensions (simple) working group in the Real-time Applications >> and >> >> Infrastructure Area of the IETF is being considered. The draft >> >> charter is provided below for your review and comment. >> >> Review time is one week. >> >> The IETF Secretariat >> >> +++ >> >> SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions >> (simple) >> >> >> ===================================================================== >> >> = >> >> Last Modified: 2007-1-24 >> >> Current Status: Active Working Group >> >> Chair(s): >> >> Robert Sparks <RjS@estacado.net> >> >> Hisham Khartabil <hisham.khartabil@gmail.com> >> >> Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area Director(s): >> >> Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> >> >> Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> >> >> Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area Advisor: >> >> Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> >> >> Technical Advisor(s): >> >> Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> >> >> Mailing Lists: >> >> General Discussion: simple@ietf.org >> >> To Subscribe: simple-request@ietf.org >> >> In Body: subscribe >> >> Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/simple/index.html >> >> Description of Working Group: >> >> This working group focuses on the application of the Session >> >> Initiation >> >> Protocol (SIP, RFC 3261) to the suite of services collectively >> >> known as >> >> instant messaging and presence (IMP). The IETF has committed to >> >> producing an interoperable standard for these services compliant >> >> to the requirements for IM outlined in RFC 2779 (including the >> >> security and privacy requirements there) and in the Common >> >> Presence and Instant Messaging (CPIM) specification, developed >> >> within the IMPP working group. As the most common services for >> >> which SIP is used share quite a bit in common with IMP, the >> >> adaptation of SIP to IMP seems a natural choice given the >> >> widespread support for (and relative maturity of) the >> >> SIP standard. >> >> This group has completed the majority of its primary goals and >> >> will focus on the remaining tasks documented here and concluding. >> >> Any proposed new work should be socialized with the chairs and AD >> >> early to determine if this WG is an appropriate venue. >> >> The primary remaining work of this group will be to complete: >> >> 1. The MSRP proposed standard mechanism for transporting >> sessions of >> >> messages initiated using the SIP, compliant to the requirments of >> >> RFC 2779, CPIM and BCP 41. >> >> 2. The XCAP framework for representing and carrying >> configuration and >> >> policy information in SIMPLE systems. >> >> 3. A mechanism for representing partial changes (patches) to XML >> >> documents and extensions to the SIMPLE publication and >> >> notification mechanisms to convey these partial changes. >> >> 4. A mechanism for initiating and managing Instant Message group >> >> chat. >> >> 5. An annotated overview of the SIMPLE protocol definition >> documents. >> >> Any SIP extensions proposed in the course of this development >> >> will, after a last call process, be transferred to the SIP WG for >> >> consideration as formal SIP extensions. >> >> Any mechanisms created for managing Instant Message group chat are >> >> intended to provide a bridge to the conferencing protocols that >> >> will be defined in XCON. They will be limited in scope to address >> >> only simple Instant Message chat with nicknames and will not >> attempt >> >> to address complex conferencing concepts such as sidebars. Their >> >> design must anticipate operating in conjunction with the >> >> conferencing protocols XCON is working towards. >> >> The working group will work within the framework for presence >> and IM >> >> described in RFC 2778. The extensions it defines must also be >> >> compliant with the SIP processes for extensions. The group cannot >> >> modify baseline SIP behavior or define a new version of SIP for IM >> >> and presence. If the group determines that any capabilities >> >> requiring an extension to SIP are needed, the group will seek to >> >> define such >> >> extensions within the SIP working group, and then use them here. >> >> Goals and Milestones: >> >> Done Submission of event package for presence to IESG for >> >> publication as Proposed Standard >> >> Done Submission of watcher information drafts to IESG for >> >> publication as Proposed Standards >> >> Done Submission of proposed event list mechanism to the SIP >> >> working group Done Submission of requirements for event publishing >> >> to the IESG for >> >> publication as Proposed Standard >> >> Done Submission of proposed mechanism for event publishing to >> the SIP >> >> working group >> >> Done Submission of SIMPLE PIDF profile to IESG for publication as >> >> Proposed Standard >> >> Done Submission of base XCAP draft to IESG for publication as >> >> Proposed >> >> Standard >> >> Done Submission of indication of instant message preparation using >> >> SIP to IESG for publication as a Proposed Standard >> >> Done Submission of XCAP usage for manipulation of presence >> document >> >> content >> >> Done Submission of XCAP usage for setting presence authorization >> >> to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard >> >> Done Submission of Filtering mechanisms to IESG for publication >> as a >> >> Proposed Standard >> >> Done Submission of instant messaging session draft to IESG for >> >> publication as a Proposed Standard >> >> Done Submission of instant messaging session relay drafts to >> IESG for >> >> publication as Proposed Standards >> >> Done Submission of Partial Notification mechanism to IESG for >> >> publication as a Proposed Standard >> >> Feb 2007 Submission of an Instant Message Disposition Notification >> >> mechanism to the IESG for publication as a Proposed Standard >> >> Feb 2007 Submission of XCAP event package to IESG or appropriate >> >> working group targeting publication as Proposed Standard >> >> Feb 2007 Submission of proposed mechanisms meeting the advanced >> >> messaging requirements to the IESG or appropriate working group >> >> Mar 2007 Submission of a performance and scalability analysis >> of the >> >> SIMPLE presence mechanisms to the IESG for publication as >> >> Informational >> >> Jun 2007 Submission of SIMPLE protocol annotated overview draft to >> >> IESG >> >> for publication as Informational >> >> Aug 2007 Submission of proposed mechanisms for initiating and >> >> managing >> >> Instant Message group chat to the IESG for publication as Proposed >> >> Standard >> >> Aug 2007 Conclusion of SIMPLE >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Simple mailing list >> >> Simple@ietf.org >> >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Simple mailing list >> > Simple@ietf.org >> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Simple mailing list >> Simple@ietf.org >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple >> _______________________________________________ Simple mailing list Simple@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
- [Simple] Internal WG Review: Recharter of SIP for… IESG Secretary
- Re: [Simple] Internal WG Review: Recharter of SIP… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Simple] Internal WG Review: Recharter of SIP… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Internal WG Review: Recharter of SIP… Hisham Khartabil
- Re: [Simple] Internal WG Review: Recharter of SIP… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Internal WG Review: Recharter of SIP… Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Simple] Internal WG Review: Recharter of SIP… Markus.Isomaki
- RE: [Simple] Internal WG Review: Recharter of SIP… Stafford, Matthew
- RE: [Simple] Internal WG Review: Recharter of SIP… Salvatore Loreto (JO/LMF)
- Re: [Simple] Internal WG Review: Recharter of SIP… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Simple] Internal WG Review: Recharter of SIP… Jonathan Rosenberg
- RE: [Simple] Internal WG Review: Recharter of SIP… Drage, Keith (Keith)