IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep

Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> Mon, 30 March 2009 03:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D97B3A6CF2 for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.537
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.537 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nvfhpsHejDKC for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nylon.softarmor.com (nylon.softarmor.com [66.135.38.164]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994763A6A55 for <sip@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (cpe-72-181-150-177.tx.res.rr.com [72.181.150.177]) (authenticated bits=0) by nylon.softarmor.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n2U3rmEb001956 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:53:50 -0500
Message-Id: <81881C2E-C631-4F46-A506-C984248337DC@softarmor.com>
From: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.barnes@nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1BF5FDAD@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:53:42 -0500
References: <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF0B168098@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se> <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1BF5FDAD@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
Cc: sip@ietf.org, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:52:57 -0000

On Mar 26, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Christer has updated the document based on the action item from  
> Wednesday's SIP session (chaired by SIPPING chairs and modeled as  
> the proposed DISPATCH WG).  If folks could please review the  
> document and raise any concerns on the document now, that would be  
> appreciated. We ask specifically for an answer to the question:  Do  
> you support the document being adopted as a WG document in RAI (WG  
> tbd)?  A simple "yes" is fine, however, if you don't think we should  
> adopt this document, could you please provide the reason.
>
>
>

So, given the outpouring of support, should we pull back the draft- 
ietf-sip-outbound and re-write it to refer to the keepalive mechanism  
of this draft instead of containing similar but not identical text?

--
Dean

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email