Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep

"yes"

Mary Barnes wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Christer has updated the document based on the action item from 
> Wednesday's SIP session (chaired by SIPPING chairs and modeled as the 
> proposed DISPATCH WG).  If folks could please review the document and 
> raise any concerns on the document now, that would be appreciated. We 
> ask specifically for an answer to the question:  Do you support the 
> document being adopted as a WG document in RAI (WG tbd)?  A simple 
> "yes" is fine, however, if you don't think we should adopt this 
> document, could you please provide the reason.
>
> For your convenience, here's the link to the document:
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-sip-keep-04.txt
> And, the diff:
> http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-sip-keep-03.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-sip-keep-04.txt 
> <http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-sip-keep-03.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-sip-keep-04.txt>
> tinyurl: http://tinyurl.com/dfyvxz
>
> Regards,
> Mary
> SIPPING WG co-chair
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Christer Holmberg
> Sent: Thu 3/26/2009 12:41 PM
> To: sip@ietf.org
> Subject: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've submitted a new version (-04) of the keep draft.
>
> The requirement text is now alligned with the text shown on the slides
> during the SFO SIP WG presentation.
>
> There are no other changes in the document from the previous version.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip