IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep

"Christer Holmberg" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Mon, 30 March 2009 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460AB3A6CE9 for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.787
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.787 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.462, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a53tmPzj3EAP for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EB128C0F8 for <sip@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id E8DD3200F9; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:19:48 +0200 (CEST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-affbdbb000006d6d-0f-49d0d504c387
Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id CE68B203BF; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:19:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.200.4]) by esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:17:42 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:17:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF0B1680B3@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <81881C2E-C631-4F46-A506-C984248337DC@softarmor.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
Thread-Index: Acmw6ySu5OqHZ/O8R3ipnGWtP4yRkgAGF7pQ
References: <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF0B168098@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se> <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1BF5FDAD@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <81881C2E-C631-4F46-A506-C984248337DC@softarmor.com>
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>, Mary Barnes <mary.barnes@nortel.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Mar 2009 14:17:42.0835 (UTC) FILETIME=[4A3EB030:01C9B142]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: sip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:18:53 -0000

Hi,

Personally I have nothing against moving the keep-alive mechanism to
draft-keep, and I guess most people agree it is how it should have been
done.

However, we have previously agreed not to do it, so I hope we will not
spend lots of time to discuss it again.

Regards,

Christer


-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Willis [mailto:dean.willis@softarmor.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 4:54 AM
To: Mary Barnes
Cc: Christer Holmberg; sip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep


On Mar 26, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Christer has updated the document based on the action item from 
> Wednesday's SIP session (chaired by SIPPING chairs and modeled as the 
> proposed DISPATCH WG).  If folks could please review the document and 
> raise any concerns on the document now, that would be appreciated. We 
> ask specifically for an answer to the question:  Do you support the 
> document being adopted as a WG document in RAI (WG tbd)?  A simple 
> "yes" is fine, however, if you don't think we should adopt this 
> document, could you please provide the reason.
>
>
>

So, given the outpouring of support, should we pull back the draft-
ietf-sip-outbound and re-write it to refer to the keepalive mechanism of
this draft instead of containing similar but not identical text?

--
Dean

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email