Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep

"Francois Audet" <audet@nortel.com> Mon, 30 March 2009 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <AUDET@nortel.com>
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D751B3A68DC for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.238
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.238 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.361, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QZPuOvllUrh7 for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtps0kp.nortel.com (zrtps0kp.nortel.com [47.140.192.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCEF28C0FC for <sip@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:09:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com (zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com [47.103.123.71]) by zrtps0kp.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id n2UHA6n00018; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:10:06 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:09:54 -0500
Message-ID: <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1D267EBE@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <81881C2E-C631-4F46-A506-C984248337DC@softarmor.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
Thread-Index: Acmw6zKd0889sHT5RxuRDPO+WEUpCAAbiqdQ
References: <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF0B168098@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se><1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1BF5FDAD@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <81881C2E-C631-4F46-A506-C984248337DC@softarmor.com>
From: Francois Audet <audet@nortel.com>
To: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>, Mary Barnes <mary.barnes@nortel.com>
Cc: sip@ietf.org, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:09:16 -0000

Dean, 

There is no reason to do so.

There is no "similar but not identical text" in draft-keep.
Draft-keep only defines a parameter that allows the usage
of the keep-alive defined in draft-ietf-sip-outbound, outside of
the context of the registration procedures
of draft-ietf-sip-outbound. 

Currently, the two drafts are carefully choregraphed to
be consistent. I don't want to undo this at the last minute.

Note that some other drafts in the queue are dependent on 
draft-ietf-outbound (e.g., draft-ietf-sip-sips). I really
don't want us to undo our work for no good reason.

I would recommend moving draft-keep swiftly to WG document.
I believe it should rapidly move into last call.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Dean Willis
> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 20:54
> To: Barnes, Mary (RICH2:AR00)
> Cc: sip@ietf.org; Christer Holmberg
> Subject: Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
> 
> 
> On Mar 26, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:
> 
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Christer has updated the document based on the action item from 
> > Wednesday's SIP session (chaired by SIPPING chairs and 
> modeled as the 
> > proposed DISPATCH WG).  If folks could please review the 
> document and 
> > raise any concerns on the document now, that would be 
> appreciated. We 
> > ask specifically for an answer to the question:  Do you support the 
> > document being adopted as a WG document in RAI (WG tbd)?  A simple 
> > "yes" is fine, however, if you don't think we should adopt this 
> > document, could you please provide the reason.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> So, given the outpouring of support, should we pull back the 
> draft- ietf-sip-outbound and re-write it to refer to the 
> keepalive mechanism of this draft instead of containing 
> similar but not identical text?
> 
> --
> Dean
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
>