Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
<L.Liess@telekom.de> Fri, 27 March 2009 17:46 UTC
Return-Path: <L.Liess@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4533A6C7B for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bPDxKG6uLPpo for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcmail83.telekom.de (tcmail83.telekom.de [62.225.183.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3DF3A6A4D for <sip@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from s4de9jsaano.mgb.telekom.de (HELO S4DE9JSAANO.ost.t-com.de) ([10.125.177.105]) by tcmail81.telekom.de with ESMTP; 27 Mar 2009 18:47:13 +0100
Received: from S4DE9JSAANI.ost.t-com.de ([10.125.177.223]) by S4DE9JSAANO.ost.t-com.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:47:11 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9AF04.0E910FF3"
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:47:10 +0100
Message-ID: <40FB0FFB97588246A1BEFB05759DC8A002CA7366@S4DE9JSAANI.ost.t-com.de>
In-Reply-To: <20B524BAC1567F48AE039F74BD294D190518E9DA@E03MVB1-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
Thread-Index: AcmuOhTsgZvUrNV7RDORHPJIBjZWIgALU8c8ACPsBeAAAzYt4A==
References: <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1BF5FDAD@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <20B524BAC1567F48AE039F74BD294D190518E9DA@E03MVB1-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
From: L.Liess@telekom.de
To: mary.barnes@nortel.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Mar 2009 17:47:11.0960 (UTC) FILETIME=[0EC9B580:01C9AF04]
Cc: sip@ietf.org, christer.holmberg@ericsson.com
Subject: Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:46:21 -0000
yes ________________________________ From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes Sent: 26 March 2009 23:17 To: Christer Holmberg; sip@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Hi folks, Christer has updated the document based on the action item from Wednesday's SIP session (chaired by SIPPING chairs and modeled as the proposed DISPATCH WG). If folks could please review the document and raise any concerns on the document now, that would be appreciated. We ask specifically for an answer to the question: Do you support the document being adopted as a WG document in RAI (WG tbd)? A simple "yes" is fine, however, if you don't think we should adopt this document, could you please provide the reason. For your convenience, here's the link to the document: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-sip-keep-04.txt And, the diff: http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmb erg-sip-keep-03.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-sip-kee p-04.txt tinyurl: http://tinyurl.com/dfyvxz Regards, Mary SIPPING WG co-chair -----Original Message----- From: sip-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Christer Holmberg Sent: Thu 3/26/2009 12:41 PM To: sip@ietf.org Subject: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Hi, I've submitted a new version (-04) of the keep draft. The requirement text is now alligned with the text shown on the slides during the SFO SIP WG presentation. There are no other changes in the document from the previous version. Regards, Christer
- [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Christer Holmberg
- [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Mary Barnes
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Theo Zourzouvillys
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Hans Erik van Elburg
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Bob Penfield
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Uzelac, Adam
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Bharrat, Shaun
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep R.Jesske
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Shida Schubert
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Doken, Serhad
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep marianne.mohali
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep steve.norreys
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep L.Liess
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Christer Holmberg