RE: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-subnot-etags-01

["DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)" <[e-mail]>]

My efforts, independently of the WGLC, to find reviewers of this
document have met with insufficient support.

Are there a couple of people out there in the SIP community, who are
familiar with the requirements of RFC 3265, who are prepared to look at
this draft with a new pair of eyes (figuratively speaking), and
essentially pull the document apart from one end to the other.

Please send me a mail directly if you consider you can do this within a
reasonable short timescale (2 or 3 weeks).

Regards

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 2:48 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-subnot-etags-01
> 
> (As WG chair)
> 
> This was a response to say that there had been no comments at 
> all on this WGLC - however Dale Worley successfully precluded 
> me saying that (thanks Dale).
> 
> Just to make sure, I would like to extend the WGLC by a week 
> to Wednesday September 26th just in case it is still sitting 
> in your pile of documents to read. Instructions for response as below.
> 
> Now I know that we had some comments from people that 
> indicated that they were pretty happy with previous versions. 
> Just in case the document is now so perfect that there are no 
> WGLC comments to make, please send the SIP WG chairs if you 
> have read the document and believe this to be the case!
> 
> Otherwise get out there and read it.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Keith
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 10:28 AM
> > To: [e-mail]
> > Subject: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-subnot-etags-01
> > 
> > (As WG chair)
> > 
> > This is to announce a Working Group Last Call for
> > 
> > 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-subnot-etags-01.txt
> > 
> > This is a two week last call. Please provide comments and review of 
> > this document by Tuesday 18th September 2007.
> > 
> > Ideally please try to identify for each comment
> > 
> > -	the precise point in the text where the comment applies (copying
> > the text and quoting the section number may help here),
> > 
> > -	the nature of the comment (NIT, minor technical, major
> > technical),
> > 
> > -	if possible a proposed solution to the comment.
> > 
> > Please send comments to the SIP WG list, and also to the 
> editor listed 
> > in the document.
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > Keith
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> > [e-mail] for questions on current sip Use 
> > [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip
> > 


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip