IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-subnot-etags-01

Aki Niemi <aki.niemi@nokia.com> Fri, 29 February 2008 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <sip-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-sip-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sip-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2587828C3F7; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:22:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.210, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yKw1VB-TABAD; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:22:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C5E3A6D50; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:22:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE283A6D50 for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:22:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AXicdb8CxeNk for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:21:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-mx03.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.230]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010773A6A02 for <sip@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:21:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id m1TELHjO025382; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:21:43 +0200
Received: from esebh104.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.34]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:21:20 +0200
Received: from esebh101.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.177]) by esebh104.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:21:20 +0200
Received: from mgw-int02.ntc.nokia.com ([172.21.143.97]) by esebh101.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:21:19 +0200
Received: from [172.21.40.116] (esdhcp040116.research.nokia.com [172.21.40.116]) by mgw-int02.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id m1TELIQL030037; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:21:18 +0200
From: Aki Niemi <aki.niemi@nokia.com>
To: ext Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
In-Reply-To: <F27EEF89-83A3-4731-B182-623C7F6486D3@softarmor.com>
References: <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE2918001636AF1@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com> <200709181506.l8IF6Bmp007748@dragon.ariadne.com> <1203976392.6192.88.camel@localhost> <200802262131.m1QLV7Rm008476@dragon.ariadne.com> <1204099738.16881.21.camel@localhost> <F27EEF89-83A3-4731-B182-623C7F6486D3@softarmor.com>
Organization: Nokia Devices R&D
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:21:11 +0200
Message-Id: <1204294871.16881.142.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Feb 2008 14:21:20.0018 (UTC) FILETIME=[5A86EF20:01C87ADE]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: IETF SIP List <sip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-subnot-etags-01
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: sip-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org

On to, 2008-02-28 at 13:35 -0600, ext Dean Willis wrote:
> 
> I see that Dale and Aki are discussing this draft.
> 
> Do we need agenda time in Philadelphia for further discussion, or are  
> we really ready for publication?

As far as I'm concerned, this is ready for publication. 

I think the issue that remains does not warrant WG time. I think in
principal me and Dale agree, but we just need to figure out what (if
anything) the draft should say on the issue. In any case, this text
would probably end up being non-normative, which means it's not critical
to flesh out in detail for a publication request.

Cheers,
Aki


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email