RE: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-subnot-etags-01

["DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)" <[e-mail]>]

I now have some volunteers to do reviews:

Avshalom Houri
Tolga Asveren
Brian Stucker

Thanks in aniticipation.

While we don't need additional formal reviews, this does not preclude
comments under the WGLC, so if you think there is a problem in the text
there somewhere, please get your comments on the list.

Regards

Keith 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) 
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 1:34 PM
> To: '[e-mail]'
> Subject: RE: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-subnot-etags-01
> 
> My efforts, independently of the WGLC, to find reviewers of 
> this document have met with insufficient support.
> 
> Are there a couple of people out there in the SIP community, 
> who are familiar with the requirements of RFC 3265, who are 
> prepared to look at this draft with a new pair of eyes 
> (figuratively speaking), and essentially pull the document 
> apart from one end to the other.
> 
> Please send me a mail directly if you consider you can do 
> this within a reasonable short timescale (2 or 3 weeks).
> 
> Regards
> 
> Keith
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 2:48 PM
> > To: [e-mail]
> > Subject: RE: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-subnot-etags-01
> > 
> > (As WG chair)
> > 
> > This was a response to say that there had been no comments 
> at all on 
> > this WGLC - however Dale Worley successfully precluded me 
> saying that 
> > (thanks Dale).
> > 
> > Just to make sure, I would like to extend the WGLC by a week to 
> > Wednesday September 26th just in case it is still sitting 
> in your pile 
> > of documents to read. Instructions for response as below.
> > 
> > Now I know that we had some comments from people that 
> indicated that 
> > they were pretty happy with previous versions.
> > Just in case the document is now so perfect that there are no WGLC 
> > comments to make, please send the SIP WG chairs if you have 
> read the 
> > document and believe this to be the case!
> > 
> > Otherwise get out there and read it.
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > Keith
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 10:28 AM
> > > To: [e-mail]
> > > Subject: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-subnot-etags-01
> > > 
> > > (As WG chair)
> > > 
> > > This is to announce a Working Group Last Call for
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-subnot-etags-01.txt
> > > 
> > > This is a two week last call. Please provide comments and 
> review of 
> > > this document by Tuesday 18th September 2007.
> > > 
> > > Ideally please try to identify for each comment
> > > 
> > > -	the precise point in the text where the comment applies (copying
> > > the text and quoting the section number may help here),
> > > 
> > > -	the nature of the comment (NIT, minor technical, major
> > > technical),
> > > 
> > > -	if possible a proposed solution to the comment.
> > > 
> > > Please send comments to the SIP WG list, and also to the
> > editor listed
> > > in the document.
> > > 
> > > Regards
> > > 
> > > Keith
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> > > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> > > [e-mail] for questions on current sip Use 
> > > [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip
> > > 


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip