IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sip] Open Issue #7: CANCEL for non-INVITE

"Bob Penfield" <bpenfield@acmepacket.com> Mon, 24 September 2001 17:48 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA25994 for <sip-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:48:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA00993; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:23:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA00966 for <sip@ns.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:23:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from acmepacket.com (mail1.acmepacket.com [63.67.143.10]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA24816 for <sip@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:23:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from BobP [63.67.143.2] by acmepacket.com (SMTPD32-6.05) id ABEAA2260398; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:22:50 -0400
Message-ID: <005d01c1451d$495722e0$2300000a@acmepacket.com>
From: Bob Penfield <bpenfield@acmepacket.com>
To: James Undery <jundery@ubiquity.net>, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@lmf.ericsson.se>, "Henning G. Schulzrinne" <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com>, 'Rohan Mahy' <rohan@cisco.com>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@lmf.ericsson.se>, sip@ietf.org
References: <NFBBIOJHKKAKGOAKHCCNEEKLCGAA.jundery@ubiquity.net>
Subject: Re: [Sip] Open Issue #7: CANCEL for non-INVITE
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:21:02 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: sip-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

From: "James Undery" <jundery@ubiquity.net>
> 
> I'd agree with this just not getting rid of 100s for non-INVITEs
>
I agree. Let proxies send 100s to non-INVITEs.

 
> James Undery
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
> 


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email