Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72

[Hadriel Kaplan <[e-mail]>]

My list is the same as John's, fwiw.
I'm also very surprised SIP can be scheduled in conflict with any other RAI WG, especially a brand new one. :(

-hadriel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> Elwell, John
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:11 AM
> To: Robert Sparks; Dean Willis
> Cc: SIP IETF; Cullen Jennings
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
>
> My 3 (well, 4) most important topics:
> - RFC 4474 issues
> - INFO
> - Next steps towards Draft
> - UA loose route
>
> John
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
> > Behalf Of Robert Sparks
> > Sent: 16 July 2008 22:21
> > To: Dean Willis
> > Cc: SIP IETF; Cullen Jennings
> > Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72
> >
> > This is a really good place to start bashing from. Thanks for going
> > through the pain it takes to put this together.
> >
> > Everyone should take note that the second session has a RAI conflict
> > (with DRINKS) and think through where to put conversations so that
> > we minimize the pain caused by the necessary split of people.
> >
> > I think I'd rather see the large, architectural questions,
> > INFO and Identity, moved into the conflict free spot and
> > put topics with a smaller constituency into the second session.
> >
> > I also think people across the working group should chime in
> > with what
> > they think
> > the three most important _DRAFTS_ to talk about, in person, at this
> > meeting are.
> > I strongly suspect there's a surprise or two that will come
> > out of that.
> >
> > I'll throw my own list in later (because I want to think
> > awhile about
> > what's _not_
> > in the proposed agenda), but to help tune things early:
> >
> > I do want to talk about 199.
> >
> > I don't see why we should spend face time on sip-keep at this point.
> >
> > I think we can get away without face time on record-route fix.
> > (its unlikely at this late stage that we'll find a crisis to work
> > through there).
> >
> > I have received very little feedback on invfix, and I don't think
> >      we need to spend any in-meeting time on the essential
> >      corrections process itself. So, I propose we take that entire
> >      topic to the list and/or hallways. I'll take on pushing a few
> >      key folks to review the big recent changes to invfix and
> >      speak up that they've done so before we get to the meetings.
> >
> > Everybody else: If you hold the token on any of the other drafts and
> > feel you can
> >   resolve any issues you currently have the same way, I strongly urge
> >   you to propose something similar for your time.
> >
> >
> > RjS
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jul 16, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Dean Willis wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This is the draft agenda for the SIP meeting at IETF 72 in Dublin.
> > >
> > > * Note that this agenda is subject to change based on list
> > > conversations
> > >
> > > * Note that we're still trying to work out how to have the
> > > "Identity" discussion
> > >
> > > Pretty HTML is at:
> > > http://www.softarmor.com/mediawiki/index.php/SIP_Agenda_IETF_72
> > >
> > > Text follows
> > >
> > > -----------------
> > >
> > > Agenda for SIP at IETF 72, Primary Session, Tuesday July 29, 2008,
> > > 1300-1500, Convention 3
> > >
> > > Agenda Bash
> > > Chairs
> > > 10
> > >
> > > Using SAML for SIP
> > > Chairs
> > > draft-ietf-sip-saml-04
> > > 10
> > >
> > > Identify requirements for test matrix to move SIP to Draft Standard
> > > Robert Sparks
> > > draft-sparks-sip-steps-to-draft-00
> > > 20
> > >
> > > Essential corrections to RFC 3261 (1st batch)
> > > Robert Sparks
> > > draft-sparks-sip-invfix-02
> > > 15
> > >
> > > Delivery of Request URI and Parameters to UAS Through Proxy
> > > Speaker TBD
> > > draft-rosenberg-sip-ua-loose-route-02
> > > draft-holmberg-sip-target-uri-delivery-01
> > > 25
> > >
> > >
> > > Mechanisms for UA Initiated Privacy
> > > Mayumi Munakata
> > > draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy-02
> > > 15
> > >
> > > MIME body handling in SIP
> > > Gonzalo Camarillo
> > > draft-ietf-sip-body-handling-02
> > > 15
> > >
> > > Guidelines for double route recording
> > > Thomas Froment
> > > draft-ietf-sip-record-route-fix-03
> > > Time TBD
> > >
> > > Keepalive Without Outbound
> > > Christer Holmberg
> > > draft-holmberg-sip-keep-01
> > > 10
> > >
> > >
> > > Agenda for SIP at IETF 72, Primary Session, Thursday July
> > 31, 2008,
> > > 1510-1610, Convention 3
> > >
> > > Agenda Bash
> > > Chairs
> > > 5
> > >
> > > Termination of early dialog prior to final response
> > > Christer Holmberg
> > > draft-ietf-sip-199-00
> > > 20
> > >
> > > INFO
> > > Speaker TBD
> > > draft-burger-sip-info-02
> > > draft-kaplan-sip-info-events-01
> > > draft-rosenberg-sip-info-litmus-01
> > > draft-kaplan-sipping-dtmf-package-00
> > > draft-willis-sip-infopackage-00
> > > 35
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> > > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> > > Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
> > > Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> > Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
> > Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
> Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip